Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, that clears the whole thing up. Life begins at conception because "Eeeee22895" on city-data says it does. Call the Supreme Court and let them know. Stop the presses on all the books out there on the subject. Close the clinics. It's been settled. Whew. That's a relief.
Now we can all go on to something else, like Obama's birth certificate. Is there a thread on that?
And yet, you can't refute any part of my definition. LOL. Leftwinger after leftwinger. All they can do is talk about something OTHER than what my airtight definition is saying. I guess facing their own hypocrisy is tough sledding.
It's not that I disagree with you, but rather would go one step further. Is not the unfertilized egg and the sperm too alive ?
If the egg is given proper fertilization (or nutrition and care as you call it) it too will become a human being....so that would seem to me to be the same situation wouldn't it ?
If you give an unfertilized egg nutrition and protection, it only grows into an old unfertilized egg. It is not an embryo. It fails the test of my definition.
Life definitely ends in frivolous wars based on lies.
Life definitely ends in ecological destruction justified by economic "progress".
It's a scientific fact.
End the hypocrisy and we'll listen. Life is life is life. You want to be pro-life, then stand up and be pro-life in all regards.
Otherwise, you're just trying to control women and force them to be subjects of the state, which last I checked is not very conservative.
Interesting you don't deny my proof that your affinity for abortion means you are killing living human beings. A million people are being killed every year by abortion. That's more deaths than any war. How on earth do you justify mass-killings on that scale?
And yet, you can't refute any part of my definition. LOL. Leftwinger after leftwinger. All they can do is talk about something OTHER than what my airtight definition is saying. I guess facing their own hypocrisy is tough sledding.
You can have your definition. You seem very happy with it. It legitimizes your beliefs. Great! (I mean it!) It does not, however, end the debate on abortion. Nothing ever will.
Fortunately, the rest of us are not required to live life by your definition.
Stay on topic, friend. Besides that, you're wrong. A baby is a separate entity.
Stay on topic. You were talking about an embryo. Now you bring up babies.
I thought your definition says that the embryo needs "adequate nutrition and care." If it's a separate entity, then an embryo can live without the mother?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
