Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Of course you realize that Limbaugh (sorry; I'm not on a first-name basis with the man) would never in a million years actually go so far as to take on a position of political party leadership. For all his ranting and raving, it's nothing more than puffery. He has a perfectly safe position on the outside looking in. If there was genuine responsibility on his shoulders, all of his inabilities and inadequacies would be exposed. And don't think he doesn't know it. That's the proverbial bottom line, no matter how loudly anyone screams and yells in his defense.
Of course you realize that Limbaugh (sorry; I'm not on a first-name basis with the man) would never in a million years actually go so far as to take on a position of political party leadership. For all his ranting and raving, it's nothing more than puffery. He has a perfectly safe position on the outside looking in. If there was genuine responsibility on his shoulders, all of his inabilities and inadequacies would be exposed. And don't think he doesn't know it. That's the proverbial bottom line, no matter how loudly anyone screams and yells in his defense.
That's WHY, among other things, I think Rushy would be(is) perfect !
Lockstep *******s WANT Rush and Coulter to represent the Republican party, because diplomacy, peace, and sound fiscal policy characterized by Ron Paul Republicans is at the bottom of the agenda. Power and blind party loyalty fuels these lemmings to ram policies through the Congress, and power is better assured if neo-cons like Rush can be attributed to the opposing party.
Lockstep *******s WANT Rush and Coulter to represent the Republican party, because diplomacy, peace, and sound fiscal policy characterized by Ron Paul Republicans is at the bottom of the agenda. Power and blind party loyalty fuels these lemmings to ram policies through the Congress, and power is better assured if neo-cons like Rush can be attributed to the opposing party.
Obama = More WAR and SPENDING
"""because diplomacy, peace, and sound fiscal policy characterized by Ron Paul Republicans is at the bottom of the agenda. ""
Yup, summed up Repubs quite nicely! Those things ARE at the bottom of their agenda.
Oh, and it isn't just us nice liberals who want Rushy representing the Republicans...it seems to be REPUBLICANS who are advocating him, too!Loving his every word, bragging about his "popularity", listening to his radio show ....
Considering the disarray of the Republican Party, should the Republican Party assume the identity of a Republican Senator like Ron Paul?
Ron Paul is not a Senator, he is a Congressman.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh, I'd say Rushy is a PERFECT representative of Republicans! They have no one better except for maybe Ann Coulter!
