Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-27-2009, 12:56 PM
 
438 posts, read 832,034 times
Reputation: 275

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by proudmama View Post
Wait a minute, where is the lie or broken campaign promise. Both Obama and McCain both stated that they were going to put the primary focus over there? Where is the lie?
Leaving up to 50,000 troops in Iraq IS NOT BRINGING OUR TROOPS HOME...moving troops to Afghanistan IS NOT BRINGING OUR TROOPS HOME.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2009, 01:09 PM
 
707 posts, read 1,022,422 times
Reputation: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by XLIGuy View Post
Leaving up to 50,000 troops in Iraq IS NOT BRINGING OUR TROOPS HOME...moving troops to Afghanistan IS NOT BRINGING OUR TROOPS HOME.

He's leaving troops in Iraq until 2010, so yes they are coming home. However BOTH candidates stated that they were going to build up the troops in [SIZE=3]Afghanistan. So again i ask, where is the lie?[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2009, 01:31 PM
 
Location: The Silver State (from the UK)
4,664 posts, read 8,242,225 times
Reputation: 2862
There is no lie. His plans for Afghanistan are actually quite realistic, but long overdue.

The problem is in the public's perception that the 'surge' worked in Iraq and this could therefore work in Afghanistan. Improvements in Iraq were actually more to do with the Sunni Arabs being defeated by the Shea. Afghanistan is completely different in its political importance, economy, and internal power struggles. Although Obama knows exactly why Afghanistan is important, I think he needs to be clearer with the public on what it is exactly he wants to achieve and how.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2009, 02:04 PM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,566,082 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by XLIGuy View Post
Just another campaign promise gone up in smoke. What a liar!
Um, what lie? I guess you didn't pay attention during his campaign for he CLEARLY said he was going to withdraw troops from Iraq & focus on Afghanistan. Jesus, you people are so screwed up, you argue over things that don't even exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2009, 02:06 PM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,566,082 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by XLIGuy View Post
Leaving up to 50,000 troops in Iraq IS NOT BRINGING OUR TROOPS HOME...moving troops to Afghanistan IS NOT BRINGING OUR TROOPS HOME.
Dude seriously, before you post on here, do your research like a good little student, ok?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2009, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Midwestern Dystopia
2,417 posts, read 3,562,426 times
Reputation: 3092
Quote:
Originally Posted by XLIGuy View Post
Just another campaign promise gone up in smoke. What a liar!

no, he was saying all along that he was going to increase the troops in Afg.,

I would really love to know the percent of sheeple that voted for him knew this.

so many are reacting like he never said it, he's been saying it for 2 freak-ing years. Wake up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2009, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Midwestern Dystopia
2,417 posts, read 3,562,426 times
Reputation: 3092
Quote:
Originally Posted by XLIGuy View Post
Leaving up to 50,000 troops in Iraq IS NOT BRINGING OUR TROOPS HOME...moving troops to Afghanistan IS NOT BRINGING OUR TROOPS HOME.
we still have 57,000 in Germany, maybe they should be guarding our bording keeping all the illegals out, we only arrest 4,000 illegals every day on the border. what an unmittigated drain on our country.

it's time to start taking care of this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2009, 09:49 PM
 
4,538 posts, read 4,811,723 times
Reputation: 1549
Quote:
Originally Posted by XLIGuy View Post
Leaving up to 50,000 troops in Iraq IS NOT BRINGING OUR TROOPS HOME...moving troops to Afghanistan IS NOT BRINGING OUR TROOPS HOME.
Doesn't this sound eerily similar to the beginnings of the Vietnam war? Obama needs to consult with Gravel, Paul and Kucinich for some sound advice on how to extricate himself from the tar pits that Bush got us into, not the Republican re-treads he has been. Afganistan's Taliban was trying to hand Bin Laden over to us before 9-11, and of course Bush didn't want him because it would have disrupted the attack. The Taliban are disgusting, but they are a direct result of our meddling in Afgaistan in order to recruit a force to fight the Russians.

Last edited by KRAMERCAT; 03-27-2009 at 10:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2009, 10:01 PM
 
2,661 posts, read 2,903,617 times
Reputation: 366
Zbigniew Brzezinski (Mika of morning joe's father) was on Rachael Maddow today, and he seemed to think well of the total strategy. He did lose me toward the end - slight accent - so I missed his last couple of remarks.

Who cares, you ask?
True, its one opinion - but I'll take that opinion over the average media personality any day.

And he kinda reminds me of Yoda.

Zbigniew Brzezinski - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
is a Polish-born American political scientist, geostrategist, and statesman who served as United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981. Known for his hawkish foreign policy at a time when the Democratic Party was increasingly dovish, he is a foreign policy "realist" and considered by some to be the Democrats' response to Republican Henry Kissinger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2009, 03:20 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Afghanistan almost bankrupted the Russians, why don't we learn?
Different time, different situation and most certainly outgunned by U.S. technology specifically the stinger missile. When the stinger was given to the Afghans the Russians were losing multiple planes and helicopters each day at the height of it effectively grounding all Russian air support and reconnaissance. They were fighting blind in a hostile environment against an adversary that knew the terrain and had nearly the same capabilities.

The U.S. does not and will never have that issue as there is multiple platforms from which they can conduct such operations giving us an overwhelming advantage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top