U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-30-2009, 03:23 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,568 posts, read 21,561,531 times
Reputation: 2518

Advertisements

So much for those faithful retired union workers....

Quote:
The Obama's administration's leading plan to fix General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC would use bankruptcy filings to purge the ailing companies of their biggest problems, including bondholder debt and retiree health-care costs, according to people familiar with the matter.
Quote:
Under this plan, the "good" GM would not be expected to hold the tens of billions of dollars in retiree and health care obligations that hurt the auto maker in recent decades. Instead, those obligations would be transferred to an "old GM," made up of less-desirable brands like Hummer and Saturn, and underperforming plants and other assets. This part of GM would likely sit in bankruptcy much longer while a buyer is sought for the parts or it is wound down.
Bankruptcy Leads Possible Plans for GM, Chrysler - WSJ.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-30-2009, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,055 posts, read 12,798,685 times
Reputation: 1401
+1 for Obama (and I don't say that often)

I'd have much more respect for him if he just let them go now, rather than let them linger for political posturing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2009, 03:28 PM
 
19,225 posts, read 15,052,714 times
Reputation: 2337
Obama Favors Bankruptcy for GM, Chrysler


HENRY FORD LIVES!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2009, 03:28 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,568 posts, read 21,561,531 times
Reputation: 2518
Funny thing is,the reason the fedgov. HAD to get involved was to stop the company going into bankruptcy.....which is now the idea favored by the fedgov.

Of course it only cost a few BILLION dollars in the meantime and who really cares about that,certainly NOT the Obamatrons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2009, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
34,040 posts, read 17,128,953 times
Reputation: 13667
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
Funny thing is,the reason the fedgov. HAD to get involved was to stop the company going into bankruptcy.....which is now the idea favored by the fedgov.

Of course it only cost a few BILLION dollars in the meantime and who really cares about that,certainly NOT the Obamatrons.
Obama couldn't help it that W gave them money.

Fortnately, Bush only gave them enough bucks to keep them afloat while he got out of the way and went back to Texas to drink himself to death. It could have been a lot worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2009, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,049 posts, read 34,088,833 times
Reputation: 10605
Well, here was GM, managing to lose $82 billion in four years. The government propped them up twice, then drew the line. What would you rather do--keep pouring money into an obviously hopeless cause...or insist that they (finally) make some legitimate changes in the way they do their business before giving them any more money?

If the last four years are any indication, GM has been aiming straight for bankruptcy anyway. Let 'em fold. At least the rest of the country won't continue paying to keep them repeating their expensive business practice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2009, 04:38 PM
 
707 posts, read 1,006,226 times
Reputation: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
Funny thing is,the reason the fedgov. HAD to get involved was to stop the company going into bankruptcy.....which is now the idea favored by the fedgov.

Of course it only cost a few BILLION dollars in the meantime and who really cares about that,certainly NOT the Obamatrons.
\

As a reminder, the Congress approved 700 billiion dollars, of which none have been distributed to the auto industry yet during this administration, only the Bush administration. But then again i'm sure you knew that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2009, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,170 posts, read 23,936,343 times
Reputation: 15277
GM stopped being relevant years ago. Their answer to hybirds was to make pickup trucks with turn signals on the side-mirrors and SUVs with heated seats for fat asses.

And the UAW sucked the American car companies dry -- let them explain to their membrers why they no longer have jobs.

Big Corporations, Big Unions ---- let 'em both die.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2009, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 63,113,767 times
Reputation: 73846
Finally something I can agree with him on. Now the car companies can ditch their loser union contracts and retool so they won't be chronically over-capacity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2009, 04:45 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,568 posts, read 21,561,531 times
Reputation: 2518
So are y'all asserting Obama opposed the loans to GM and Chrysler????

If so,could you provide some cites illustrating as much.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top