U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-02-2009, 06:53 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,043 posts, read 12,317,702 times
Reputation: 1396

Advertisements

http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf

Got freedom?

Obama is outBushing Bush once again
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2009, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,630 posts, read 26,818,040 times
Reputation: 11374
The date on the reg is 14 Jan 2005. Updated from 1997.

This regulation provides Army policy and guidance for establishing civilian inmate labor programs and civilian prison
camps on Army installations. Sources of civilian inmate labor are limited to on– and off–post Federal corrections
facilities, State and/or local corrections facilities operating from on–post prison camps pursuant to leases under Section
2667, Title 10, United States Code (10 USC 2667), and off–post State corrections facilities participating in the
demonstration project authorized under Section 1065, Public Law (PL) 103–337. Otherwise, State and/or local inmate
labor from off–post corrections facilities is currently excluded from this program.


So you're blaming Obama for an regulation last updated during the Bush administration?
Better get your talking points straight.

Last edited by chielgirl; 04-02-2009 at 07:40 AM..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2009, 07:03 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,043 posts, read 12,317,702 times
Reputation: 1396
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
The date on the reg is 14 Jan 2005.
Who was president at that time?
I think it was, yes, I'm sure it was, GWBush.
So the order for this was immediately publicly revoked by The One on day 1 because it's so detestful. Oh no? I guess he was too busy working out the details for obligatory "volunteer" work, G.I.V.E.

No lectures on Bush. Never liked the guy, and I'm not a neo-con-munist like the Bush/Obama team are.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2009, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,630 posts, read 26,818,040 times
Reputation: 11374
Yeah, nice backstepping.

I think there are more important items on Obama's plate at this time.
You do know that and complain about the other issues frequently.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2009, 08:15 AM
 
13,180 posts, read 14,151,616 times
Reputation: 4547
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
The date on the reg is 14 Jan 2005. Updated from 1997.

This regulation provides Army policy and guidance for establishing civilian inmate labor programs and civilian prison
camps on Army installations. Sources of civilian inmate labor are limited to on– and off–post Federal corrections
facilities, State and/or local corrections facilities operating from on–post prison camps pursuant to leases under Section
2667, Title 10, United States Code (10 USC 2667), and off–post State corrections facilities participating in the
demonstration project authorized under Section 1065, Public Law (PL) 103–337. Otherwise, State and/or local inmate
labor from off–post corrections facilities is currently excluded from this program.




So you're blaming Obama for an regulation last updated during the Bush administration?
Better get your talking points straight.
Nice catch...they guy is so busy throwing mud he doesn't take the time to read it all....LOL
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2009, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,630 posts, read 26,818,040 times
Reputation: 11374
I read DoD regulations regularly, always look for the dates.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2009, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,043 posts, read 12,317,702 times
Reputation: 1396
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Yeah, nice backstepping.

I think there are more important items on Obama's plate at this time.
You do know that and complain about the other issues frequently.
Yeah, plans for a civilian detention center are relatively unimportant relative to finding new and creative ways to get cars and homes to those who can't afford them.

I also take it disposing of these unclassified docs is more difficult logistically than the sweeping executive order to shut down Gitmo. Or, maybe it's not as kewl for his moron GenY crowd who aren't aware of such plans but know of Gitmo?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2009, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,630 posts, read 26,818,040 times
Reputation: 11374
Why didn't you complain about it when GWB updated the regulation?
Or was it a-ok when he reviewed and updated it?
(As if any of them look at it personally).

Your backstepping is pretty funny. Keep it up.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2009, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth/Dallas
11,885 posts, read 35,231,217 times
Reputation: 5644
I have to agree that it wasn't created under Obama. Him not revoking it doesn't mean he is responsible.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2009, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,043 posts, read 12,317,702 times
Reputation: 1396
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Why didn't you complain about it when GWB updated the regulation?
Or was it a-ok when he reviewed and updated it?
(As if any of them look at it personally).

Your backstepping is pretty funny. Keep it up.
Never supported GWB and disapproved of his policies concerning this.

Bush is not an antonym of Obama, more like a synonym.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2022, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top