Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2009, 03:53 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,141,005 times
Reputation: 6195

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe107 View Post
Obama is using the crisis as an excuse to pursue his policies.
If the economy was doing well, he would say we are so prosperous & wealthy and that is why we need better infrastrutre & healthcare (more gov spending on top of more gov spending) he's a snake salesman.

(Whatever the current situation is) is why we need more gov spending and higher taxes
God forbid we should improve the infrastructure and healthcare situation.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2009, 03:56 PM
 
3,150 posts, read 8,713,819 times
Reputation: 897
Socialism, per Merriam-Webster:


Main Entry:so·cial·ism Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\ Function:noun Date:1837

1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done



Can anyone thoughtfully dispute that we are experiencing the first definition? Also, please remember, goods don't only have to be tangible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Yes
2,667 posts, read 6,777,279 times
Reputation: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
God forbid we should improve the infrastructure and healthcare situation.....
But the current healthcare system makes us a nation of slaves and that's cool. Want to quit your job? Joke is on you. We don't quit jobs here in America - and if you do we'll punish you. We'll take away yer' health care. If you feel like manning up, be our guest. We'll make you pay out the butt for Cobra, buy a doo-doo personal health care package with high premiums, not have insurance, or find another job immediately. Screw taking the time to do what you like while knowing you won't go bankrupt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 04:02 PM
 
Location: New York, New York
4,906 posts, read 6,844,675 times
Reputation: 1033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe107 View Post
Obama is using the crisis as an excuse to pursue his policies.
If the economy was doing well, he would say we are so prosperous & wealthy and that is why we need better infrastrutre & healthcare (more gov spending on top of more gov spending) he's a snake salesman.

(Whatever the current situation is) is why we need more gov spending and higher taxes
How do you come to this conclusion?

In case you didn't notice the tax cuts initiated by Reagan led to huge defecits.

Clinton managed to be fiscally responsible...the republicans try to take credit for it but they obviously have no clue how to balance the federal budget.

Bush came into office with a surplus and left us bankrupt.

So what credibility does the right have when speaking of fiscal responsibility?

What credibility do you have calling him a socialist when you didn't even know what socialism is?

You called for the dummies to wake up, so wake us up. Explain to us how he is or would do what you claim?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 04:02 PM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,826,282 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTraik View Post

3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
this sounds a bit like a gender gap. power of elite and their labor which make their goods and make way less than they

capitalism
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 04:03 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 3,246,052 times
Reputation: 508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe107 View Post
50 years ago government spending was 28.77% of economy. 10 years ago it was 33.42% of economy.

OBAMA wants to make it almost 45% of the economy this year. Wait til the end of his term.


Attention dummies: this is socialism in the making
Socialism is yearly government spend?? Wow... I completely misunderstood my civics and government classes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 04:07 PM
 
1,490 posts, read 2,032,380 times
Reputation: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
God forbid we should improve the infrastructure and healthcare situation.....
Why do women with breast cancer come to the US for treatment?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 04:07 PM
 
Location: New York, New York
4,906 posts, read 6,844,675 times
Reputation: 1033
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTraik View Post
Socialism, per Merriam-Webster:


Main Entry:so·cial·ism Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\ Function:noun Date:1837

1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done



Can anyone thoughtfully dispute that we are experiencing the first definition? Also, please remember, goods don't only have to be tangible.
Yes..

Quote:
In general, liberals favor constitutional government, representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals at various times have embraced both constitutional monarchy and republican government. They are generally opposed to any but the milder forms of nationalism, and usually stand in contrast to conservatives by their broader tolerance and in more readily embracing multiculturalism. Furthermore, they generally favor human rights and civil liberties, especially freedom of speech and freedom of the press (while holding various positions on whether people have an inherent right to the means of economic subsistence). However, the liberal commitment to unrestricted individual liberty is not necessarily absolute: as Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. said, "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre...," and liberal parties support restrictions on incitement to violence.
Liberals also typically believe in a free market and free trade, but they differ in the degree of limited government intervention in the economy which they advocate. In general, government responsibility for health, education and alleviating poverty fits into the policies of most liberal parties. But all of them, even American liberals, tend to believe in a far smaller role for the state than would be supported by most social democrats, let alone socialists or communists.
Liberalism - Definition
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 04:08 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 3,246,052 times
Reputation: 508
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTraik View Post
Socialism, per Merriam-Webster:


Main Entry:so·cial·ism Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\ Function:noun Date:1837

1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done



Can anyone thoughtfully dispute that we are experiencing the first definition? Also, please remember, goods don't only have to be tangible.
why don't you thoughtfully argue that we are?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 04:18 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,450,111 times
Reputation: 4799
Keep thinking that's what liberalism stands for. That's classic liberalism. Liberalism today if not socialism is communist but they would refuse to just come out and say it because of the stigmata. It's plain as day by many posting here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top