Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-20-2009, 09:37 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 10,278,203 times
Reputation: 1893

Advertisements

Why is income beyond $97,000 exempt from social security taxes?

I think we need to start talking about this, as a nation. That's a TON of tax-free income for the wealthy. Bizarre.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-20-2009, 09:42 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 10,278,203 times
Reputation: 1893
Some ideas:

Tax Day: You Pay Your Taxes -- Why Don't the Rich Pay Their Share? | Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace | AlterNet
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2009, 09:52 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,346,581 times
Reputation: 1633
It's not important unless you can blame Obama and those darn pesky liberal citizens of the USA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2009, 09:58 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,020,628 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingForward View Post
Why is income beyond $97,000 exempt from social security taxes?

I think we need to start talking about this, as a nation. That's a TON of tax-free income for the wealthy. Bizarre.
Are folks in this income bracket allowed to withdraw their SS benefits at retirement? If not, then they have every rights to keep their money. If they are allowed to withdraw SS benefits, then they need to pay up like everyone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2009, 09:59 PM
 
Location: Idaho Falls
5,041 posts, read 6,216,911 times
Reputation: 1483
It would be an extremely easy fix to the SS shortfall.

Conservatives keep claiming that SS is failing, just as a way to try and kill it. In reality, there are several easy fixes. Increase immigration by 1%. Raise the retirement age a couple years (admittedly, this one isn't popular - even with me). Get rid of the cap. Etc.

But they don't want to hear anything except "privatize" or "kill."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2009, 10:02 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,978,392 times
Reputation: 4555
Because the payout on the other end is capped. Lifetime high end earners to not recieve SS checks that are in proportion to their lifetime incomes...the amounts only go so high.

Don't get me wrong I'm for progressive tax rates, but the idea is that SS is not a "retirement" plan but a social safety net for those who didn't save enough.

Now for those incomes from zero to 97K...it is a progressive structure. Those that make 20K will recieve more benefit for the buck compared to someone who makes 90K per year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2009, 10:08 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 10,278,203 times
Reputation: 1893
Quote:
Originally Posted by msconnie73 View Post
Are folks in this income bracket allowed to withdraw their SS benefits at retirement? If not, then they have every rights to keep their money. If they are allowed to withdraw SS benefits, then they need to pay up like everyone else.
Yes, they withdraw social security just like everybody else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2009, 10:19 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,020,628 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Because the payout on the other end is capped. Lifetime high end earners to not recieve SS checks that are in proportion to their lifetime incomes...the amounts only go so high.

Don't get me wrong I'm for progressive tax rates, but the idea is that SS is not a "retirement" plan but a social safety net for those who didn't save enough.

Now for those incomes from zero to 97K...it is a progressive structure. Those that make 20K will recieve more benefit for the buck compared to someone who makes 90K per year.
Wow! This is the first post of yours that I agree with! What is this world coming to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2009, 10:32 PM
 
9,846 posts, read 22,677,486 times
Reputation: 7738
Gee now wait a minute the leftists have been telling me all my life that social security was not a tax but a benefit since I was too incompetent to save for my retirement.

Well I guess not. How much more of my paycheck do the leeches want? I already pay fed, state and 15% SE which covers SS and medicare, not to mention all the other nickel and diming they do to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2009, 10:33 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Because the payout on the other end is capped. Lifetime high end earners to not recieve SS checks that are in proportion to their lifetime incomes...the amounts only go so high.

Don't get me wrong I'm for progressive tax rates, but the idea is that SS is not a "retirement" plan but a social safety net for those who didn't save enough.

Now for those incomes from zero to 97K...it is a progressive structure. Those that make 20K will recieve more benefit for the buck compared to someone who makes 90K per year.
I find what you said here to be every bit as good as msconnie did. What is going on? Are you getting ready to retire? I have been there for 14 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top