Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Tonight on MSNBC, Rachel Maddow interviewed Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), a member of the Judiciary Committee, about his views on whether Jay Bybee should be impeached:
MADDOW: Do you think that it is possible that an impeachment inquiry is warranted in this case, if only because the circumstances that are known about Judge Bybee's career are now so different than when the Senate voted on
him in 2003?
WHITEHOUSE: It is certainly possible that an impeachment inquiry is warranted. But I think that decision should probably wait until the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility finishes its investigation into the Office of Legal Counsel and all of these opinions.
Whitehouse said the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility is expected to release the results of its year-long investigation in the very near future.
I would say it's definitely warranted. The kind of "tortured" logic that Bybee and Woo used would have gotten you laughed out of class in some law schools. And yet Woo is still employed, with tenure yet at that (supposed) bastion of liberality UC Berkely. I have a few acquaintances that are Boalt grads and they are not happy about that.
An honorable man would resign from his seat on the Federal bench, but from his writings we know that won't happen.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.