Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To alot of peoples' surprise many, if not most, of our national monuments in Washington DC are privately funded. The WWII monument that opened in 2004 was funded primarily by private donations, which played a part in why there wasn't a monument to "America's Greatest Generation" for 60 years. Martin Luther King Jr. doesn't have a national monument yet, due in part because the private funds haven't been raised.
In your opinion, should this remain a private cause, or should the public have some vested interested in funding national monuments?
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
