Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-28-2009, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,066,605 times
Reputation: 954

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stri1252 View Post
The problem is that abortions are to cheap and easy to get, and seeing as 97% of abortions are performed as a form of birth control shows that the greater majority of woman who decide are simply not ready to have a child, and if that's the case they shouldn't be having sex. After all that's what sex is designed to do; create life.
Sex was designed to feel good. Creating babies was the trick. If sex was like taking cod liver oil, we'd have very few babies.

 
Old 09-28-2009, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,222,878 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Neo-Con....No I don't think so. The point I was trying to make is that the deomographic of our society that are hell bent (pardon the pun) on removing a woman's right to choose are the same ones who are frequently big time shoppers of Wallmart, where the profit, in part, goes to pay for abortions in China. I thought that anti-choice advocates were against abortions everywhere...not just in the U.S. Infringing on someone else's rights are fine I guess...unless you yourself have to make some type of sacrifice...even if that sacrifice is something as mundane as cheaper prices.
So let me get this right if you shop at wall mart you will get an abortion?
A woman at thsi pont has the legal right to kill, much as the germans had a legal right to kill within their laws.
Both are genocides, both are defended by saying it was legal.
 
Old 09-28-2009, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937
Actually, sex was "designed" for procreation - to preserve the Human race.

The fact that sex also "felt" (feels) good is ancillary
 
Old 09-28-2009, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,448 posts, read 15,481,027 times
Reputation: 18992
Quote:
Originally Posted by stri1252 View Post
Why? It is not the woman who's life is at stake.

Why does the woman get to choose the babies destiny?

Why is it that if you want it, it's a baby and if you don't, it's a fetus?

If you were aborted you wouldn't be here... bottom line...

"A life is a life, no matter how small" -Horton Hears a Who
Arguing with someone who is pro-life is like a dog chasing its tail, really. I'm pro choice, and I know I'm not going to dissuade you. But I do take exception to your assertion that a woman's life isn't at stake. Yes, it is. Carrying a baby to term, and then giving birth, is risky business. Take it from someone who has had a baby and developed complications late in the pregnancy. Just because women aren't dying in screaming agony as much anymore doesn't mean that childbirth is on the same level as passing gas. Also, on another front, a woman's life is greatly impacted by the birth of a child, especially if the pregnancy was unplanned.

The woman gets the right to choose the fetus' destiny because she is the one whose body is supporting and carrying the fetus, which can cause health problems to her, among other things. As for me not being here if my mom chose to abort me, I could live with that, because my mother probably made a hard decision and I'd rather not be here than be robbed of a wonderful nurturing mother/daughter relationship or a life filled with neglect. As a child, I would have been devastated if my mom in a fit of rage stated that she didn't want me. But this is all hypothetical because I was planned, I was wanted, I was loved. My mother got a divorce and raised me singly, but I was still loved and wanted and cherished. Not all unplanned pregnancies result in the Hallmark special, where the mother suddenly feels this bond with the fetus, gives birth, and everybody is warm and fuzzy. For some, there is no bond. There is no reason that a child should be born under those circumstances. For those who feel they can handle the unplanned pregnancy, by all means, have the child. For those who don't, I am glad pregnancy termination exists and a woman has a right to choose.

PS - choosing to end a pregnancy is a very difficult decision for a woman to make. I really wish people would stop making it seem like it's right on up there with the difficulty of choosing a dress to wear.
 
Old 09-28-2009, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,222,878 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlchurch View Post
Sex was designed to feel good. Creating babies was the trick. If sex was like taking cod liver oil, we'd have very few babies.
who is the designer of sex?
 
Old 09-28-2009, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,066,605 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Actually, sex was "designed" for procreation - to preserve the Human race.

The fact that sex also "felt" (feels) good is ancillary
Right by the "intelligent designer in the sky" ROFLMAO
 
Old 09-28-2009, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlchurch View Post
Right by the "intelligent designer in the sky" ROFLMAO
If you are referring to God - yes, you are correct.
 
Old 09-28-2009, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,066,605 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
who is the designer of sex?
Darwin
 
Old 09-28-2009, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,698,072 times
Reputation: 9980
Sounds to me like you want to put a Government Bureaucrat betwee Doctor and Patient, what are you, some kind of Socialist
 
Old 09-28-2009, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,066,605 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
If you are referring to God - yes, you are correct.
I'm not. I'm scoffing at the ignorance of posters.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top