Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-07-2009, 09:33 AM
 
Location: NW MT
1,436 posts, read 3,302,945 times
Reputation: 551

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
The best thing to happen to the Republican party, complete and total control of the Democrats..
Maybe the republican party appointed Spector as the designated secret agent spy and sent him over to the Democratic party to infiltrate and...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2009, 09:40 AM
 
532 posts, read 1,232,105 times
Reputation: 139
this is why Obama is a liar and should not be trusted by anyone.

He is seeking $81 billion more in spending in his record $3.55 trillion budget plan while calling on Congress to trim $17 billion worth of programs.

See attached.

Get ready for a bad future with all this debt. It's going to be like carrying a trailor up a hill.


Obama Proposes Saving $17 Billion by Cutting Programs (Update1) - Bloomberg.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 10:01 AM
 
Location: The Great State of Texas, Finally!
5,476 posts, read 12,247,018 times
Reputation: 2825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe107 View Post
this is why Obama is a liar and should not be trusted by anyone.

He is seeking $81 billion more in spending in his record $3.55 trillion budget plan while calling on Congress to trim $17 billion worth of programs.

See attached.

Get ready for a bad future with all this debt. It's going to be like carrying a trailor up a hill.


Obama Proposes Saving $17 Billion by Cutting Programs (Update1) - Bloomberg.com

And 40% of those 17billion in cuts are the same programs Bush proposed to cut, and those cuts were rejected by Congressional dems. You see, some things never change....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 10:15 AM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,863,294 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
SOURCE


In any case, Orszag said, "$17 billion a year is not chump change by anyone's accounting."


This will be interesting...
Do your math. 17 billion of cuts compared to the outlandish 3.4 trillion budget is a drop in the bucket. As one Washington official put it, it is like taking a teaspoon of water from a full bathtub, with the faucet still running full blast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 11:04 AM
 
Location: NW MT
1,436 posts, read 3,302,945 times
Reputation: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsupstate View Post
Do your math. 17 billion of cuts compared to the outlandish 3.4 trillion budget is a drop in the bucket. As one Washington official put it, it is like taking a teaspoon of water from a full bathtub, with the faucet still running full blast.
That example is still too complicated for libs to understand. Most don't take baths or know what one is... It needs to be more simplified and on a level which they understand better. Like this...

0bama just gave you a backpack with 100# in it and demanded you climb a 1 mile high mountain (that's 5280' for all you libs that don't know). And at the same time said we will be generous and trim off a little distance to make it easier. His 17 Billion represents just over 26' of that 5280'. Now keep in mind that the evil W's backpack he gave you weighed a hefty 29# in comparison AND he demanded you carry it the whole 5280 feet. Why that ba$t@rd...

He wasn't as nice as 0bama by trimming off that 26' and giving you 3x as much to carry... My king my savior ! Quick... give me that pack !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,600,753 times
Reputation: 1680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephan_K View Post
That example is still too complicated for libs to understand. Most don't take baths or know what one is... It needs to be more simplified and on a level which they understand better. Like this...

0bama just gave you a backpack with 100# in it and demanded you climb a 1 mile high mountain (that's 5280' for all you libs that don't know). And at the same time said we will be generous and trim off a little distance to make it easier. His 17 Billion represents just over 26' of that 5280'. Now keep in mind that the evil W's backpack he gave you weighed a hefty 29# in comparison AND he demanded you carry it the whole 5280 feet. Why that ba$t@rd...

He wasn't as nice as 0bama by trimming off that 26' and giving you 3x as much to carry... My king my savior ! Quick... give me that pack !
What an interesting attempt at responding to the topic at hand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,600,753 times
Reputation: 1680
Default yawn.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gsupstate View Post
Do your math. 17 billion of cuts compared to the outlandish 3.4 trillion budget is a drop in the bucket. As one Washington official put it, it is like taking a teaspoon of water from a full bathtub, with the faucet still running full blast.

Quote:
Congressional Republicans immediately denounced the cuts as insufficient when some details of them emerged yesterday. The criticism drew a retort this morning from White House budget director Peter Orszag, who went on MSNBC to stress that the cuts are just a start on the long-term work of curbing government spending, notably the growth of the Medicare and Medicaid health care programs.
SOURCE


In any case, Orszag said, "$17 billion a year is not chump change by anyone's accounting."

Predictable. Didn't we start the thread clearing this out of the way.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
I think Obama should go bipartisan, listen to the republicans, and stop trying to trim billions of dollars from the budget (which amounts to more than the pork barrel spending republicans were screaming about). That would be, by GOP definition, fiscally conservative thing to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
I think it's funny that all of the sudden republicans are pretending to be fiscally conservative.
Leave Republicans out of this for the moment. Do you Think this is fiscally responsible?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top