Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Expansion of the Federal government, expansion of the national debt by borrowing against future generations which is wholly fiscally irresponsible. His support of draconian and oppressive measures against individual constitutional rights. His liberal and progressive foreign policy and embrace of preemptive warfare. His almost contemptuous disregard towards the US Constitution as well as his consolidation of power into the Executive Branch.
Cheney isn't a Conservative, he is a militant liberal Neoconservative.
1) I guess you're talking about 9-11, the war, and homeland security when you talk about debt. Sorry, but Bill Clinton's negligence and deferred maintenance towards national security was costly. You either pay the bill or take another more expensive hit down the road. Complaints about some domestic spending programs are legit. But then you have to praise Bush and Cheney for their tax cuts and support of business. And if you think the GOP ran up the deficit, you ain't seen nothing yet.
2) The torture complaint is liberal crybaby stuff. Do we want to nail the bad guys or do we not?
3) Sure, we could have let the terrorists off the hook after 9-11. That would have been the best and fastest way to guarantee another hit. It didn't happen under Bush/Cheney.
The 'neocon' label was a hate moniker cooked up by the Left. It's the same as "Far right wing" I do not recognize either term.
I love it when the Republicans target a solid 20% of the vote.
I think you know the base is more than half the electorate. That's why your side is kneecapping Sarah Palin even though conventional wisdom says she is yesterday's news. If you truly believed the 20% narrative, you wouldn't see Sarah as a threat and wouldn't bother with her.
I think you know the base is more than half the electorate. That's why your side is kneecapping Sarah Palin even though conventional wisdom says she is yesterday's news. If you truly believed the 20% narrative, you wouldn't see Sarah as a threat and wouldn't bother with her.
No your base is about 20%.
Any Democrat with an ounce of sense would love to see the Wasilla Hillbillie run on the Republican ticket. She's our dream Republican Candidate. How about Senator Maccaca as her running mate?
1) I guess you're talking about 9-11, the war, and homeland security when you talk about debt. Sorry, but Bill Clinton's negligence and deferred maintenance towards national security was costly. You either pay the bill or take another more expensive hit down the road. Complaints about some domestic spending programs are legit. But then you have to praise Bush and Cheney for their tax cuts and support of business. And if you think the GOP ran up the deficit, you ain't seen nothing yet.
2) The torture complaint is liberal crybaby stuff. Do we want to nail the bad guys or do we not?
3) Sure, we could have let the terrorists off the hook after 9-11. That would have been the best and fastest way to guarantee another hit. It didn't happen under Bush/Cheney.
The 'neocon' label was a hate moniker cooked up by the Left. It's the same as "Far right wing" I do not recognize either term.
So in essence you love sadistic liberals with guns and poor accounting skills, how nice. Oh, and you don't have to recognize gravity either if you wish, but good luck with that. Thanks for the laugh though.
Any Democrat with an ounce of sense would love to see the Wasilla Hillbillie run on the Republican ticket. She's our dream Republican Candidate. How about Senator Maccaca as her running mate?
Wrong. You're afraid of Sarah. That's why you're insulting her even today. You know how popular she is among conservatives. You know that she outdrew McCain 10 to 1 at rallies last fall. And her brand of fiscal conservativism is looking better and better after watching the Manchild spending like there is no tomorrow.
I think you know the base is more than half the electorate. That's why your side is kneecapping Sarah Palin even though conventional wisdom says she is yesterday's news. If you truly believed the 20% narrative, you wouldn't see Sarah as a threat and wouldn't bother with her.
Sure they are. How about some links to that incredible assertion.
You do understand that over 50% of US voters voted for Obama.
None of us see Palin as a threat, just as a hypocritical buffoon providing a lot of humor.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
