Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2009, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Nassau, Long Island, NY
16,408 posts, read 33,300,458 times
Reputation: 7340

Advertisements

I think there should be at least a choice to buy into a universal health care plan for both employers and individuals. We don't need to dismantle the entire system.

For those who are afraid of bureaucracy ruining healthcare, all I can say is you must not have an HMO. I have one and they have lowered what they will pay to doctors to the point that all doctor's waiting rooms are already like the DMV. I missed an appointment last week and had to reschedule. You know the next appointment available was in the middle of July! Then when it comes to what they will cover they give conflicting information and then try and gyp you afterwards. You would not believe how much time I have spent on the phone being passed around their various customer service departments and nothing is settled. This is one of the first HMOs in the country also, not some new inexperienced place. What they are doing is trying to save money by inconveniencing and improperly treating the patients. The problem with our healthcare system is that healthcare insurance is a "for profit" system, so their goals (treat patients and make money) are directly opposing each other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2009, 02:08 PM
 
513 posts, read 837,448 times
Reputation: 330
Yes. Insurance companies do not belong between people and treatment. And putting it on the back of employers creates unfair situations, making some unable to compete with countries that have universal healthcare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2009, 05:49 PM
 
7,928 posts, read 9,150,257 times
Reputation: 9340
Quote:
Originally Posted by click View Post
Just also wanted to say, being self employed and paying for it myself and going about 50% of the time without it, if companies stopped paying for everyone's health insurance and EVERYONE had to pay for their own out of their own salary, you would hear a major outcry and a change would come so fast your head would spin. It is like paying for another mortgage every month, big time.
Agreed. I'm self emplyed and the premiums are crazy.

Could you imagine the hysteria on LI if teachers, police and govt workers lost their subsidized health insurance and had to pay for it out of their own salary or taxes? That would be the only fair way to implement it. No exemptions, everyone must pay into the system according to salary. As Obama said :we've all got to have some "skin in the game."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2009, 10:36 PM
 
1,010 posts, read 3,930,768 times
Reputation: 187
Just a reminder, universal healthcare does not necessarily mean a government run system or even single-payer (there are several successful hybrids).

As it stands, outside New York (or Massachusetts) i cannot buy insurance on the individual market, because I have preexisting health conditions. In some states, I can buy a guaranteed-issue policy which will exclude my preexisting conditions and, because i have had a Caesarean section, may exclude maternity if that is even available. (All the HIPAA regs about preexisting conditions do not apply to individual policies; they can be excluded as long as the insurer wants.) In NYS, I can buy it, but not at a price I can afford.

At the very least, everyone should be able to buy insurance, and it should cover all conditions. In order to do that, carrying at least a minimal level of health insurance will have to become obligatory (the reason it is unaffordable in NYS is because they imposed community rating and a death spiral was created).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 08:01 AM
 
15 posts, read 44,779 times
Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by click View Post
Just also wanted to say, being self employed and paying for it myself and going about 50% of the time without it, if companies stopped paying for everyone's health insurance and EVERYONE had to pay for their own out of their own salary, you would hear a major outcry and a change would come so fast your head would spin. It is like paying for another mortgage every month, big time.
We are both self-employed but have never made enough to start being able to afford health insurance, and the one option, Healthy New York, is a joke and a half. I also have friends whose deductible has gone so high through their jobs that they feel they might as well have no insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 08:06 AM
 
15 posts, read 44,779 times
Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by fopt65 View Post
Agreed. I'm self emplyed and the premiums are crazy.

Could you imagine the hysteria on LI if teachers, police and govt workers lost their subsidized health insurance and had to pay for it out of their own salary or taxes? That would be the only fair way to implement it. No exemptions, everyone must pay into the system according to salary. As Obama said :we've all got to have some "skin in the game."

In my opinion these public -- and unionized workers -- are the biggest screamers against universal health care. They don't get it. They call it socialism. Well, these guys have socialized healthcare paid for by the taxpayers. The non-public sector unionized employees are on board with universal healthcare because they know the reason they are losing their jobs is, in part, because of the explosive costs -- healthcare was/is GM's biggest expense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 08:48 AM
 
13,511 posts, read 17,032,823 times
Reputation: 9691
Health care should be not for profit.

I'm covered by my wife's insurance because she is a teacher. However, I know many people who either can't afford or who are getting buried by the ridiculous costs. This country needs universal health care, despite what Sean Hannity keeps telling everyone. It's amazing how easily people were suckered by the Insurance industry with their dishonest commercials in the 90's.

"But, we won't be able to see our doctor!!"

Lies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618
NO,

government care is just that the government DETERMINES who, what , when and where on YOUR BODY

and the cost is unthinkable....trillions of cost to whom YEARLY???....THE TAXPAYER

government care???? social security....broke
medicare......broke
medicaide.....abused and broke
welfare......abused and costing the ACTUAL TAXPAYERS


will UHC lower costs....no
will UHC keep people out of the emergency room???....NO


....why because DOCTORS, hospitals, etc STILL NEED TO MAKE A LIVING TOO......btw the AVERAGE ELECTRICAL cost to RUN a hospital is over 400,000 per month....imagine having a 400k a month electric bill......will UHC lower that cost....NO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 10:00 AM
 
13,511 posts, read 17,032,823 times
Reputation: 9691
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
NO,

government care is just that the government DETERMINES who, what , when and where on YOUR BODY
As opposed to a profit driven HMO, who determine what, when, and where on your body based on making a profit.

Argument: sunk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618
no as oposed to CHOICE

everytime we turn around the government is taking MORE and more of our freedoms


france has NHC...its going broke
england has NHC...is is NOW saying certain people cant get certain precedures because of age, weight, smoker, etc
canada has a NHC,,,and its starting to PRIVITIZE



what we need to do is go back to HOSPITALIZATION....

where the cost of a MAJOR problem (where you are hospitalized) is covered....not every time you have a sniffle you go to the doctor and charge the health ins......that is the abuse that has driven the cost skyrocketing

you need to go to the doctor for a sniffle, a pimple, or a splinter....pay the $50-80 visit charge......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top