Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-26-2009, 07:15 PM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,560,035 times
Reputation: 1836

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
the point is, I crushed your argument. there is no further reason for you to post on this thread. go to another.
Dude, please get a clue, wise up & start making sense when you post. At this point, your post makes no sense, sorry. So whatever crushing you did will have to be diverted to someone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2009, 07:18 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,708 posts, read 34,525,339 times
Reputation: 29284
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok
Quote:
There is a little thing called the 2nd Amendment. Having a gun is an actual constitutional right
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkb0305 View Post
in order to have a militia.
mmm, no.
please try to keep up.

Individual Gun Rights Protected, Top U.S. Court Says (Update6) - Bloomberg.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,453,455 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
It is funny. The libs will say that same-sex marriage is a right under the US Constitution, but that gun ownership is not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 07:20 PM
 
Location: I currently exist only in a state of mind. one too complex for geographic location.
4,196 posts, read 5,841,798 times
Reputation: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by karfar View Post
Dude, please get a clue, wise up & start making sense when you post. At this point, your post makes no sense, sorry. So whatever crushing you did will have to be diverted to someone else.
I can't understand your post. you have had too much red wine. post again when you have a clear mind. until then, good day to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 07:21 PM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,560,035 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
I can't understand your post. you have had too much red wine. post again when you have a clear mind. until then, good day to you.
I know, english is tough to comprehend nowadays, isn't it? Cheerio!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 07:24 PM
 
Location: So Cal
10,028 posts, read 9,500,216 times
Reputation: 10449
Quote:
Originally Posted by karfar View Post
LOL, oh you poor thing. As someone else mentioned in response, "marriage is not a right in the constitution". Well well well....let me ask you something, how would you feel if you as a heterosexual were denied the ability to get married? After all, it's not in the constitution, correct? Therefore, none of you should be getting married. Would you cry, cower in a corner, stand up & fight to be allowed to marry? A simple answer will suffice.
Simply, the Supreme Court rightfully ruled that the ban does not violate homosexuals civil rights. This has nothing whether I support gay marriage or any type of marriage, which I do.

Now you poor thing, deal with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 07:36 PM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,560,035 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by VLWH View Post
Simply, the Supreme Court rightfully ruled that the ban does not violate homosexuals civil rights. This has nothing whether I support gay marriage or any type of marriage, which I do.

Now you poor thing, deal with it.
Deal w/what? The fact that marriage is NOT in the constitution, therefore according to others who have mentioned it, it is NOT a right? Meaning heterosexuals should not be allowed to get married either. Simple as that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 07:38 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,708 posts, read 34,525,339 times
Reputation: 29284
Quote:
Originally Posted by mossomo View Post
Dissident Justice Carlos Moreno said, "Granting same-sex couples all of the rights enjoyed by opposite-sex couples , except the right to call their officially recognized and protected family relationship a marriage, still denies them equal treatment," Moreno said.

I agree with the first half of what Justice Moreno said. CA gays have the same rights and privileges as any other Californian. California is fairly progressive in that way, no one here really cares about your sexual orientation.

But the second part, I disagree as you can't just redefine a word.
a most excellent point.

Quote:
Don't tell me words don't matter!
-B.H. Obama
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 08:06 PM
 
Location: 602/520
2,441 posts, read 7,006,467 times
Reputation: 1815
This is ridiculous. Proposition 8 in California did not take away anyone's rights. Gays in California share the same rights as married, heterosexual couples in California. Proposition 8 took away the ability for gays to attach the word "marriage" onto those rights. Gay people can still visit their significant others in the hospital and can share the same benefits as married, heterosexual couple. They just can't be husband and husband or wife and wife.

I think that marriage is a sacred bond that should only be afforded to opposite sex couples. Gays and their supporters need to realize that people are not going to shed their morals just to appease a small group of people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2009, 08:07 PM
 
8,762 posts, read 11,569,482 times
Reputation: 3398
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
the point is, I crushed your argument. there is no further reason for you to post on this thread. go to another.
Huh?

What argument? What theory?

Are you all full of illusions? Yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top