Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And not even Blacks were instrumental. Earlier analysts debunked the claim that the Black vote is what pushed 8 over the top. Blacks are a small portion of the population in California, and as a result an even more minute sliver of the voting population.
Liberals promoting what essentially amounts to voter disenfranchisement of minorities. How magnanimous of them.
I have now - officially - seen it all.
Edit:
On closer inspection, the post appears to be nothing more than a clever attempt at trolling. I highly doubt any sensible supporter of gay marriage would seriously advocate such a heinous strategy.
You cannot put the rights of a minority up to a vote of the majority. That is fundamentaly flawed. The founders never intended for this to be a 'rule by the will of the people' country. That's why there is an independent judiciary who are appointed for a term of 'good behavior' i.e. life. Read the Federalist Papers #78 by Alexander Hamilton regarding the judiciary for the thinking of the founders on this issue.
The court did not rule against Gay families. In fact they ruled for Gay families. They said that Gays couples must be treated the same as straight couples with the exception of they didn't want it called marriage. That's simply semantics. A rose by any other name smells as sweet.
- Reel
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.