Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-14-2009, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Great Falls, Montana
4,002 posts, read 3,904,398 times
Reputation: 1398

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reelist in Atlanta View Post
Ok, lets get back to being serious.

Has anyone seen the collapse of building 7 at the World Trade Center back in 2001? I hate to drag out the dead horse but anyone who is buying that as anything other than a controlled demolition really is stupid. It was obviously a controlled demolition. So when was it planned and when were the charges placed. Certainly not on 9-11.

Damage to the building and fires would not have caused it to collapse uniformly at free fall speed the way it did. Come on folks! Wake up!
YAWN ..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2009, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
15,154 posts, read 11,621,740 times
Reputation: 8625
Quote:
It was obviously a controlled demolition
Quote:
Damage to the building and fires would not have caused it to collapse uniformly at free fall speed the way it did. Come on folks! Wake up!
Some might call it competent engineering. Because, when you build a skyscraper in a area with many other skyscrapers and millions of people around, who in thier right mind would build a skyscraper that would fall over onto other buildings? Now if the planes hit the lower floors of the tower, yeah, it would probably fall over, but they hit like the 85th floor..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2009, 01:47 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,933,215 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17 View Post
I mean WTH?
How many people does he have to pick before there is one that doesnt have a sorted pass? Did he really think no one would care that he picks tax cheats, and racists to these various posts? Does he think that we will happily agree with whomever he picks?
What is "a sorted pass" did change lanes in some unusal manner?
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2009, 02:34 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by karfar View Post
WTH are you even talking about?


You know these NeoConfuseds have BIG problems with people having a "sorted pass"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2009, 03:17 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,318,165 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
You know these NeoConfuseds have BIG problems with people having a "sorted pass"
Maybe that's similar to a checkered pass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2009, 03:25 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
Maybe that's similar to a checkered pass.

Or a warted a$$?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2009, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
15,154 posts, read 11,621,740 times
Reputation: 8625
h... I see a few people who lost an argument resorting to making fun of spelling errors..liberal tactic #4. Thanks for bieng so predictable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2009, 06:15 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17 View Post
h... I see a few people who lost an argument resorting to making fun of spelling errors..liberal tactic #4. Thanks for bieng so predictable.

And this would be as opposed to NeoConfused Tactic #1: Making baseless, inane allegations?

And just FYI, using sorted in place of sordid is faaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrr from a spelling error.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2009, 06:18 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,318,165 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17 View Post
h... I see a few people who lost an argument resorting to making fun of spelling errors..liberal tactic #4. Thanks for bieng so predictable.
I before E except after C - I think ees got it!

Ba-Ba-Bieng!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2009, 06:19 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
15,154 posts, read 11,621,740 times
Reputation: 8625
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
And this would be as opposed to NeoConfused Tactic #1: Making baseless, inane allegations?

And just FYI, using sorted in place of sordid is faaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrr from a spelling error.
Uh..yeah. I meant to say "Sorted past"..not "Sorted pass"..see..simple spelling error..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top