Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-02-2009, 12:19 PM
 
Location: San Diego
2,521 posts, read 2,347,939 times
Reputation: 1298

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcsldcd View Post
Oh goody another gay marriage thread.


Negative? putting the stamp of approval on abnormal relationships.
Um, this is exactly what the OP was saying shouldn't be a response.

This is a legitimate question asking what direct harm gay marriages cause. Clearly you have no evidence of any direct harm so you just say that gay relationships are abnormal and that it somehow harms a family of four in Des Moines if a gay couple gets married in Cedar Falls...but it doesn't and you clearly know that. You are just offended by gays and it makes you feel icky...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-02-2009, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Mississauga
1,577 posts, read 1,955,807 times
Reputation: 306
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Doesn't say you can't traffic in kiddie porn or sell crack either. So what's your point?
Clear - kiddie porn supports the suffrage of children who are not consenting adults. I have no opionion on crack.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2009, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Mississauga
1,577 posts, read 1,955,807 times
Reputation: 306
Quote:
Originally Posted by omle View Post
Not an oxymoron.
Did you correct Mossomo when he stated gay marriage is an oxymoron ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2009, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Mississauga
1,577 posts, read 1,955,807 times
Reputation: 306
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Marriage is defined as a natural biological and spiritual union between one man and one woman. If it were not, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Were I married myself, the definition of the relationship that I would have with my wife would also define me as the husband of a wife. Furthermore, it would define the offspring we created though the exclusive sexual relationship of our marriage. It would also define our family structure. Your alternative and unnatural sexual union with a member of your own gender being defined in identical terms to the natural one trespasses on the definition of both marriage and family. You are not free to alter the definition my family and of the union I share with my wife (someday) any more than you are free to paint my house. If it doesn't suit your needs, move on because it isn't yours to change.
How many countless groups in the history of the world have been oppressed. Let's not get into the whole history of tradition nonsense that your side always wants to emotionally grapple onto. For pete sake how many slaves have there been in all of history? How many women not treated equally and not even allowed to vote in a democracy? In India many people can't marry who they want it is an arrangement - shall we continue this historical precedent? It meets stringent marriage definitions requirements though - actually according to some it is a superior system as it eliminates emotion and fulfils the family need to carry on successors best suited to meet the family's caste status. But is it right?? Your definition of marriage is one of many! With such a rigid definition though, what is the logic than in a couple divorcing as it only serves to appease emotion. If two married people can produce offspring and they meet the requirements of your definition than why should society permit divorce? It all boils down to this, if societal laws permit infringement on the rights of some groups, it always leaves the door open for others' rights to be infringed upon.

Furthermore, people always attack gay marriage because they feel it opens the door to other groups - namely children. Let's be clear virtually nobody except those that want to violate the rights of a citizen who not yet is able to make the same choices as an adult deserve to not recieve equal treatment under the law because they are infringing on child rights! Gay marriage has always been about consensual adults and never about involving children. Any such correlation is nonsensical, imaginative and emotional delirium.

Last edited by mississauga75; 06-02-2009 at 02:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2009, 02:14 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,659,127 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by rigas View Post
As for how has it negatively effected me, I have a 6 yr old who has asked 10000 questions including "why are those men kissing" IMO this effects me negatively as I don't belive in it and should not have to explain it to my son. I
Aww... You poor thing.

Part of being a responsible parent is having to explain things to your children - even things that you find embarrassing or complicated. The world doesn't exist to please you.

If you don't want to explain it to your son, just tell him you're uncomfortable talking about it or change the subject. Chances are that he'll be more enlightened about human sexuality by the time he's 15 years old than you are now. He'll probably be able to educate you someday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2009, 02:15 PM
 
Location: Mississauga
1,577 posts, read 1,955,807 times
Reputation: 306
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Aww... You poor thing.

Part of being a responsible parent is having to explain things to your children - even things that you find embarrassing or complicated. The world doesn't exist to please you.

If you don't want to explain it to your son, just tell him you're uncomfortable talking about it or change the subject. Chances are that he'll be more enlightened about human sexuality by the time he's 15 years old than you are now. He'll probably be able to educate you someday.
Welcome back
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2009, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,782,217 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Aww... You poor thing.

Part of being a responsible parent is having to explain things to your children - even things that you find embarrassing or complicated. The world doesn't exist to please you.

If you don't want to explain it to your son, just tell him you're uncomfortable talking about it or change the subject. Chances are that he'll be more enlightened about human sexuality by the time he's 15 years old than you are now. He'll probably be able to educate you someday.



YAY!! You're back!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2009, 02:20 PM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,560,035 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Aww... You poor thing.

Part of being a responsible parent is having to explain things to your children - even things that you find embarrassing or complicated. The world doesn't exist to please you.

If you don't want to explain it to your son, just tell him you're uncomfortable talking about it or change the subject. Chances are that he'll be more enlightened about human sexuality by the time he's 15 years old than you are now. He'll probably be able to educate you someday.
LOL, welcome back!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2009, 02:21 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,659,127 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by mississauga75 View Post
Welcome back
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post


YAY!! You're back!!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by karfar View Post
LOL, welcome back!
Thank you, thank you, thank you.

We'll see how long I get to stay this time around. I better not be too liberal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2009, 02:30 PM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,560,035 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Thank you, thank you, thank you.

We'll see how long I get to stay this time around. I better not be too liberal.
DOH!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top