Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-14-2009, 06:31 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,742,682 times
Reputation: 3146

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
What was the claim again? Oh yeah...

WOW AND IT TOOK hussein obama ONLY FOUR MONTHS TO BEAT THEIR RECORD AND OUT SPEND THE ACCUMULATION OF EVERY PRESIDENT IN HISTORY.

That's actual spending already accomplished in four months that exceeds the level of all spending in US history, but you've tried to cite a projection of deficits that extends over the next ten years. Do you understand the difference between these two concepts?

Sadly -- and just as was pointed out -- the original claim is not even close to true.

So you are fine with the projected deficit? Got it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2009, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,591,561 times
Reputation: 1680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atilla View Post
Solutions I don't like. For crying out loud manwhat solutuions. I can present a total drunken fool with enough resources and for a while it may take on the appearance that a total progressive change has occurred. For a short while money can fix a lot of things. When the money is all gone and spent and thrown away at non productive gimmickry,...then what? You are going to see inflationary trends in the short run and real pain in the intermediate run. They are just .issing money away friend. There is no cure in this juveniles solutions.
Did you read the article associated with this thread's op?

I'd say you're ignoring obvious problems and, consequently, the solutions because you refuse to either - accept the ineptitude of the offender based on some preconceived notion, because of lack of knowledge, or perhaps deliberate intention.


i.e. We've spent millions on a mess hall that we didn't need, will only use for two years and are close to abandoning, while spending millions to upfit another.

Quote:
Construction of a $30 million dining facility at a U.S. base in Iraq is scheduled to be completed Dec. 25. But the decision to build it was based on bad planning and botched paperwork.

The project is too far along to stop, making the mess hall a future monument to the waste and inefficiency plaguing the war effort, according to an independent panel investigating contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In its first report to Congress, the Wartime Contracting Commission presents a bleak assessment of how tens of billions of dollars have been spent since 2001. The 111-page report, obtained by The Associated Press, documents poor management, weak oversight, and a failure to learn from past mistakes as recurring themes in wartime contracting.
Are you seriously telling us - you don't see a problem, a solution and a potential for oversight that could reduce fraud and increase efficiency to the tune of millions?

Interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2009, 10:50 AM
 
Location: stairway to heaven
1,133 posts, read 712,075 times
Reputation: 242
I don't think there is any question every administration throws money away. This is how they maintain their power. The thing I find amusing is the convenient use of statistics that people use to justify any end.
"Anyone who looks through enough statistics will eventually find numbers that seem to confirm a given vision. Often, the same set of statistics contains other numbers that seem to confirm diametrically opposite conclusions. The same is true of anecdotal facts. That is why evidence is different from mere data, whether numerical or verbal."

This is why we have false messiahs such as Ralph Nader and Al Gore.

Yes sir, George Bush was as good a spending democrat as any president in history. The current "evidence" exists, that his successor is already four times the loose cannon and he hasn't even gotten around to health care yet.

History should have taught us all, the politically left and the politically right, that it is extremes that get us into trouble. There is no greater extremist than the one we now have in office. There will be a price to pay for this degree of extremism. You play with statistics and who bares those statistics all you want...the "evidence "is in play.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top