Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I guarantee he is not in his eighties, if he is then he is a very fit looking 80 year old. This guy is so crazy! Why is America and the world so F'ed up?!?!?!
NBC News is reporting that the suspect in Wednesday's shooting at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. is James W. Von Brunn, an 89-year-old man with ties to white supremacist groups.
All I meant is that news reporters should not speculate at all about a suspect's history and possible connections. The reporter who wrote the MSNBC blurb should have gathered a few more facts and presented those to the reader, or simply not mentioned "possible" ties to white supremacist groups. There was both too much information and not enough in that MSNBC news blurb that had been linked to/posted.
The article was just sloppy journalism. That's all I was saying.
UPDATE: Suspect is an 89 year old white male, with ties to white supremacist group.
Another senseless act of domestic terrorism by another radical right wing extremist group. These groups sure do create and foster a lot of "lone wolves".
It's time for a major crackdown on these groups and their hate-filled incendiary rhetoric that is designed to incite people to acts of rage and senseless violence.
No, it isn't time to install a police state because some lone individual shot someone in public. This is exactly the kind of response the government wants us to have. The lone nut jobs are hardly the problem, they are blown entirely out of proportion. Start at the top--where the real criminals and sadists are--and work your way down.
Who knows which groups to target? That's a slippery slope! And when would it stop? This is NOT the right approach.
All I meant is that news reporters should not speculate at all about a suspect's history and possible connections. The reporter who wrote the MSNBC blurb should have gathered a few more facts and presented those to the reader, or simply not mentioned "possible" ties to white supremacist groups. There was both too much information and not enough in that MSNBC news blurb that had been linked to/posted.
The article was just sloppy journalism. That's all I was saying.
Us logical folks knew exactly what you were saying. It's the small minds in the liberal camp that can't process that much logic without blowing a gasket.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
