Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Easy....
one if leftwing and tries to help poor people
the other is rightwing and try to help well-off people.
That's gotta be the most clear difference between the two of them.
We've already had the "who is more generous thread?" Liberals don't give nearly as much to the poor as conservatives with Christian fundamentalists way out front on giving along with active Roman Catholics. Some of the most stellar examples of slighting the poor are the limousine liberals while the superstars of helping the poor are those Southern white Christian fundamentalists the liberals love to blame for everything from serial killers to cloudy days.
"In the South, people are more likely to donate to churches and charities partly because of their higher levels of religiosity, said Scott Douglas, executive director of Greater Birmingham Ministries, which over 39 years has distributed millions of dollars in donations, food and clothing contributed by supporters. The GBM group works with a cooperative of 20 faith traditions including Greek Orthodox, Jewish, Protestant and Catholic."
"Arthur Brooks, the author of a book on donors to charity, “Who Really Cares,” cites data that households headed by conservatives give 30 percent more to charity than households headed by liberals. A study by Google found an even greater disproportion: average annual contributions reported by conservatives were almost double those of liberals."
Easy....
one if leftwing and tries to help poor people
the other is rightwing and try to help well-off people.
That's gotta be the most clear difference between the two of them.
one is left-wing and tries to help poor people by using other people's money
the other is right-wing and tries to help poor people by using their own money
that will always be the difference---and notice how our president has become the premier left-wing black televangelist that tells you to "send in your money" for a blessing and to keep voting "Damnocrat"
one is left-wing and tries to help poor people by using other people's money
the other is right-wing and tries to help poor people by using their own money
that will always be the difference---and notice how our president has become the premier left-wing black televangelist that tells you to "send in your money" for a blessing and to keep voting "Damnocrat"
Looks like Dopo got it right.
GWB was a televangelist for the filthy rich - BHO, a televangelist for the unwashed masses.
Both depend heavily on the use of force.
It would seem that the left is more humane in having its benefits-recipients comprise individual humans versus corporate charters.
But back to black versus white fundamentalist Christians - have vs have-not Christians?
Owners vs Slaves?
One religion suiting both?
Or, one religion, made two by each?
Reverend Wright vs Pat Robertson - wouldn't mind seeing those two debate.
Which would be more likely to support the killing of an abortion doctor?
That is because abortion is not a top priority for religious Black fundamentalists. But killing Whitey sure is their top priority, like this Black Muslim group called the Death Angels who have ties with the Nation Of Islam. Zebra murders - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
On everything that has to do with black people you bring this up. Sir, this happened in 1974, by a small amount of people...let's move into this world...now.
It was a horrible thing, yes, but I do not see mass amounts of white people being targeted to be killed by the whole black population, now.
If you want to go there, I can say that white people have killed more black people in the past than those zebra murders, but lets not take it there.
Anyway to the OP, I think that black fundamentalist are more talk than action and white fundamentalist, are so filled with hatered that they act with violence to prove themselves as heroes for their cause.
Also black fundamentalist do not use Christianity for an excuse to commit murder.
Both are wrong though.
On everything that has to do with black people you bring this up. Sir, this happened in 1974, by a small amount of people...let's move into this world...now.
It was a horrible thing, yes, but I do not see mass amounts of white people being targeted to be killed by the whole black population, now.
I don't suppose you watch or read the news much. But their motives go unreported, since it is so common (and unremarkable in the media's minds).
Really, well since you have the inside scoop, would you care to share that information?
You choose to join the group that ignores black gang activity, while these members have church affiliatons? This is so common, you also find it unremarkable?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.