Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sorry, Silly Sarah is missing the boat. The country is going in a new direction when it comes to are energy needs called alternative energy...
You know, when you start out by name calling it just shows the weakness of your arguement. Of course your arguement is really nothing but to attack everything conservative and try to belittle it, direct any discussion to one you want.
"It's a great venue that we have, a vehicle called AGIA, the Alaska Gas Line Inducement Act, and believe me, Exxon, the largest company in the world, and TransCanada, the best pipeline building company in the world, I'm sure they would not have aligned and committed to building this project had they not crunched the numbers and figured out that for their bottom line."
WSJ admits Greenspan was off base on LNG New market analysis says demand for natural gas was just plain wrong
The message from Greenspan was clear: New facilities would have to be built in the U.S. to handle the expected surge in imports.
But now the WSJ says, "Mr. Greenspan and the industry experts who shared this view - and there were many - couldn't have been more wrong."
The Journal reported that within a year of Greenspan's testimony, FERC revealed there were plans for 40 new or expanded LNG terminals under consideration in North America. By 2005, that list had grown to 55.
"Today only six have been built, and most of those sit idle. Weeks pass between visits from a tanker full of frosty LNG," The Journal wrote. "Even before the economic slowdown, it was clear the nation had ample natural-gas supplies. Large-scale imports simply weren't needed. And new reports suggest the U.S. won't need to turn into a massive importer of natural gas anytime soon.
She was only coherent when speaking about the one subject with which she is very conversant - Alaska's energy policies. She does get points for being able to speak on a topic for which she is prepared - can't really be sure she is knowledgeable, but she knows her script on this one. Nothing in this interview supports the contention that she is intelligent.
Nor does it support the position that she isn't intelligent or lacks knowledge on a subject. If you are going to criticize, at least be fair and consistant.
No, more like because of a well established pattern of bigotry from this individual.
Yeah, well I commented on the video and all I got was called naive and then a soliloquy on Barack Obama. Face it, nobody wanted to talk about this video - it was just another opportunity to name call "the other side". I mentioned several times that if we're going to post in a thread about the video - we should talk about the video, but no one responded.
Sarah Palin is one of the best representatives of how anti intellectual the GOP has become. Religious, anti-abortion but really loves to shoot a deer. Only a person with a lower than average IQ would see her as anything "inspirational". Typical small town white trash
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
