Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Interesting however none of this supports the poster I was responding to. He claimed planning started from the day Bush took office. These links actually disprove his contention. Thanks!
You got as far as link #1...good start. You seem to need this next.
"The following are [PNAC] personnel who are either members of or close to the Bush administration:"
So happy somebody is brave enough to call Cheney on his mongering:
CIA head says Cheney almost wishing US be attacked - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090614/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_panetta_cheney - broken link)
Show me where Cheney said he wished America gets attacked?
Then maybe the rest of the links will make sense to you. Sorry I skipped this but I thought everyone knew it.
I read them all they were all over the place some contend the planning started 10 days after he took office some say 2002 very well researched and a great deal of consensus. These are the same kind of moon landing nuts.
I read them all they were all over the place some contend the planning started 10 days after he took office some say 2002 very well researched and a great deal of consensus. These are the same kind of moon landing nuts.
It seems to me that the world trade attacks start wth a prtty big bang o clinton's watch witht eh first world trade center bombing.I fact there is information that Clinton was offered Bin Laden and din't even recognise who he really was. looking at the nuber of attcks on US interest on cliton watch is really distrubing in that he basically took teh same approach that Obama is now. In fact Penetta has critized Obama on this approach himself and certinly isn't a expert on stopping terrorism as has been seen.Chaney expressses a view that many have and they go al the way back to the church comission.Ddi Buiden not say in his presdiental camp[aign that Oabam would be yestede and both he and Clinton said that he wqas not ready for it.Theyseemed as convinced as Chaney is really.
I have no idea what the third link is supposed to prove. On 3/5 there was a list of companies that wanted to work in Iraq. Like there are in Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Alaska. Don't really get the significance.
Downing Street memo 7/23/2002.
The last link has nothing to do with the timing of the decision to attack Iraq.
Next time read your own links.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
