|
06-14-2009, 08:29 PM
|
|
|
|
1,465 posts, read 6,066,230 times
Reputation: 939
|
|
|
For not supporting Sarah Palin. Nice mom, probably a decent person but I have yet since the moment it was announced she would be vice president candidate utter one coherent point about any U.S. related policy that wasn't regurgitated republican talking points. Her interviews make me cringe. Does the republican party have any other females that can articulate a point and message without handlers stepping in?
|
|
06-14-2009, 08:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 15,884,358 times
Reputation: 4583
|
|
|
You're not a sexist, you're a clear thinker as it relates to Ms. "I Can See Russia From My House."
Being anti-Sarah Palin isn't the same as being anti-woman.
Last edited by afoigrokerkok; 06-14-2009 at 08:41 PM..
|
|
06-14-2009, 08:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Idaho Falls
5,041 posts, read 6,029,730 times
Reputation: 1483
|
|
|
No, you're not sexist. Just intelligent. (Were you just fishing for that compliment?)
|
|
06-14-2009, 08:36 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Reading, PA
4,011 posts, read 4,280,538 times
Reputation: 843
|
|
|
You are sexist
1. if you don't support Sarah Palin simply because she's a woman or
2. if you support her simply because she's a woman.
Or if you hold her to a higher or lower standard because she's a woman.
Simply not liking her or not supporting her candidacy does not make you sexist.
|
|
06-14-2009, 08:38 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Bay Area
111 posts, read 307,148 times
Reputation: 142
|
|
|
LOL i agree to this
|
|
06-14-2009, 08:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Bay Area
111 posts, read 307,148 times
Reputation: 142
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by idahogie
No, you're not sexist. Just intelligent. (Were you just fishing for that compliment?)
|
LOL i agree with this  |
|
06-14-2009, 08:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 32,089,380 times
Reputation: 4269
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok
You're not a sexist, you're a clear thinker as it relates to Sarah Palin.
Being anti-Sarah Palin isn't the same as being anti-woman.
There are many women in both parties that do a fine job.
|
Name a couple from each party that you think could beat Palin in a race for public office. |
|
06-14-2009, 08:45 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Reading, PA
4,011 posts, read 4,280,538 times
Reputation: 843
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
Name a couple from each party that you think could beat Palin in a race for public office.
|
Lisa Murkowski and Kay Bailey Hutchison for the Republicans.
No point in listing any Democrats because Palin supporters will shout them down.
|
|
06-14-2009, 08:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Great Falls, Montana
3,998 posts, read 3,770,565 times
Reputation: 1393
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok
You're not a sexist, you're a clear thinker as it relates to Ms. "I Can See Russia From My House."
Being anti-Sarah Palin isn't the same as being anti-woman.
|
You got that right
There's a big difference between being anti-woman and being anti-idiot |
|
06-14-2009, 08:47 PM
|
|
|
|
134 posts, read 146,809 times
Reputation: 50
|
|
I think the democrats are frightened by Sarah Palin. Why did they try to discredit her before they even knew her. I would love to see a debate between Sarah and Nancy Polosi. Palin would make mince meat out of her.  |
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
