Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
it is fascinating that americans would rather turn on each other, finding different groups to tax, than address the issue of government overspending (and wasteful spending) in the first place.
it is fascinating that americans would rather turn on each other, finding different groups to tax, than address the issue of government overspending (and wasteful spending) in the first place.
And in what irresponsible way would the newly collected revenue be utilized?
Talk about fat, our government needs to go on a diet.
enough is enough.
it is fascinating that americans would rather turn on each other, finding different groups to tax, than address the issue of government overspending (and wasteful spending) in the first place.
it is fascinating that americans would rather turn on each other, finding different groups to tax, than address the issue of government overspending (and wasteful spending) in the first place.
But since 'the government' is supposedly us, that would still be turning on each other
As far as the rest.....hell, we're all going to get it.....this bantering is just about who's going to get it first and for a specifically cited excuse
Overeating and not exercising are the problems, not junk food. How are you gonna stop those two things?
You can tax junk food, but people will still overeat if they really want to. There's also no way to make anyone workout and exercise if they don't want to do it.
Hopefully people will start taking better care of their heath without any taxes. A book on nutrition doesn't cost much, and you don't have to be super intelligent to know how to read.
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,080,865 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by bababua
Wouldnt this help our economy? Less health care, less weight would equal less energy usage. Just seems to make sense to me? Any ideas?
Should we tax posters who start goofy threads?Wouldn't this help our economy?Less stupid threads would equal less energy consumption,less visits to the ER with migraines...I say let's tax people who start idiotic threads.
I think taxing "weight" maybe going too far....however the bigger one is the more resources one would need. We tax smokers....for health reasons , so why not other groups? It's debatable.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And in what irresponsible way would the newly collected revenue be utilized?
