Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm saying that she was never on the hook because of the very low standards of behavior of those in control. If she was telling the truth, the CIA should be investigated. The fact that this has gone no further pretty much tells me that it wasn't the CIA who was lying and that party politics and cya trumps anything else.
She should have been. If the Speaker of the House claims that the CIA habitually lies to the body that has the responsibility of oversight, then it's a big deal. It's a big deal if they lie, and it's a big deal if she carelessly accuses the CIA of lying. Brushing over that because of partisan support is not good. I thought that in the new era of transparency, someone would want to know if the CIA was lying and concealing their actions from Congress.
That's right. If the CIA habitually lies, then how can Congress make appropriate decisons if they're not getting the correct info? Of course, we know the truth about this mess. Transparency only pertains to the Administration demanding it from others. The rules do not apply to Barry and his thugs.
That's right. If the CIA habitually lies, then how can Congress make appropriate decisons if they're not getting the correct info? Of course, we know the truth about this mess. Transparency only pertains to the Administration demanding it from others. The rules do not apply to Barry and his thugs.
Four years of Carter and Democrats in Congress changed all that. A lot of the young people who swelled the Democrat's ranks this last election cycle will be the very same ones who will realize they are the ones footing the bill for the Democrat's election year slush fund and special favors for the party faithful. After the bloodletting of this current inept and inexperienced administration, the voters will be looking for a genuine conservative statesman with a significant resume.
Well rangel has been on the side burner for sometime now because the ethic committeee is don't nothing. It is just a matter of time until thing leak etc.
After the bloodletting of this current inept and inexperienced administration, the voters will be looking for a genuine conservative statesman with a significant resume.
Such as Sarah Palin???????????????? You DON'T HAVE any genuine conservative statesmen with signifcant resumes. They're all New and Blue Dog Democrats. You've got a bunch of loose-cannon right-wing bozos to pick from...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
