Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Dont be disingenuous. It's not news about illegal immigration. It's an article about something Al Sharpton said.... Sharpton vs Sheriff Joe... a reliable sheepie Infuriator and a reliable sheepie Hero.
So in general when a conservative cheats on his wife people think he is being hypocritical because he talks one way and does another, BUT when a liberal cheats on his wife it is understood that is expected so who is surprised. Ok, I get it now. Geesh. Roll eyes.
It was NOT news about illegal immigration, it was Al Sharpton fussing about racial profiling.
In any case, they sat on this story. Do you think they would have sat on a story about, say, Nancy Pelosi or her husband cheating?
Well Newsweek sat on the Lewinski scandal for 3 days until Drudge broke the story. Why? To protect Clinton, or because they thought no one was interested? And to answer your question, No, Fox would not sit on a story if the person who is 3rd in line for the Presidency cheated. Now if a democrat politician from Omaha or souix city was cheating, no, they wouldnt bother.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17
...and FOXnews is fair enough to run ads for CNN! and plays pro-Obama commercials. The other day I was watching Bill Hemmer and Megyn Kelly, and when they cut to commercial, there was an ad For Olberman's show! I thought WTH? then, I realized that FOXnews is truly fair and balanced if they are willing to air ads for thier competition.
WHAT part of commercial TV are you having difficulty with?
PAID ads have nothing to do with fairness................................
They'd even run an ad for you if you ponied up enough $$$
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,080,865 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell
WHAT part of commercial TV are you having difficulty with?
PAID ads have nothing to do with fairness................................
They'd even run an ad for you if you ponied up enough $$$
He's got to get out of the basement and earn that first dollar before he can realize that dream......Mom can't pay for EVERYTHING and those playstation 3 games ARE getting expensive.
On a sidenote...ELO,even tho we pick on you we are still glad you are here...we lost shoppingcartlaw just after the election to a bout of full on insanity and you have taken his place (and I have thought all along that you are his new screen name anyway...plus who would be crazy enough to LISTEN to ELO,much less admit it as you do in a public forum)....every site needs a rambling,off the wall crazy type to keep the rest of the posters amused and we appreciate you for it even tho' we don't say it enough....Here's to you ELO...thank you for being THAT guy
So in general when a conservative cheats on his wife people think he is being hypocritical because he talks one way and does another, BUT when a liberal cheats on his wife it is understood that is expected so who is surprised. Ok, I get it now. Geesh. Roll eyes.
Probably because a story of a cheating politician is inconsequential to the destruction of the US by the NObama admin..that seems a little more newsworthy.
You are such a silly silly Obama hater!!!
Do you wake up everyday like this??? All I can say is WOW - you must be very very frustrated...
Well Newsweek sat on the Lewinski scandal for 3 days until Drudge broke the story. Why? To protect Clinton, or because they thought no one was interested?
So you're admitting Faux was indeed protecting Ensign
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17
And to answer your question, No, Fox would not sit on a story if the person who is 3rd in line for the Presidency cheated. Now if a democrat politician from Omaha or souix city was cheating, no, they wouldnt bother.
What if it was a Republican senator from Nevada, who until a recent dark day was planning to run for prez? I guess Faux was waiting til next week, when he would be more "important." Ya think?
We were hoping, when GOP Senator and Promise Keeper John Ensign revealed his affair, for more rightblogger outrage, but alas, they have been pretty quiet about it. Riehl World View is forgiving: "People are human, they make mistakes" -- except when they're Democrats, especially Clinton, whose "behavior abused or denigrated the office he held," says Riehl. Plus, in Clinton's case it was "any potential blackmail that caused me the greatest concern," whereas Ensign "exposed the affair the minute he realized he was in jeopardy of being black mailed." Maybe we should put Ensign up for the Medal of Honor.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
