Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The really odd thing about this is that at the time of Palin's "roll-out" as VP candidate there were some legitimate questions about the baby and pregnancy;
Why would a 43 year old woman, on her 5th pregnancy, carrying a DS child leaking amniotic (is that the correct word) fluid, get on a plane and fly from TX to AK?
Why did the flight attendants on that flight say Palin exhibited no signs of being pregnant?
Apparently no one in the MSM wanted to ask those questions so Sullivan wrote an email to the McCain campaign which began with the words; "I'm sorry it has come to this but..."
He never got a response and I'm not sure how many more times he asked. I've read a fair amount of Sullivan's work and never read more about it although that doesn't mean he hasn't written more about it.
What may be key to sanrene's "Trig truther" comment is the fact that Sullivan did write, in "The Atlantic" (I think) not just online an article exposing Palin for her many egregious lies. So now there are many sites where it's easy to find sanrene's minders calling him out, while also making a big pitch to raise money for Palin and her campaign.
Strange that like the "birthers" always shout about Obama, "show us the birth certificate", why wouldn't Palin show the medical records? Goose/gander?
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
