Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-29-2009, 09:43 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,555,075 times
Reputation: 29287

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingForward View Post
Interesting.

RealClimate
left-wing blogs that fail to refute anything are entertaining, but far from interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2009, 09:54 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,555,075 times
Reputation: 29287
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Fake Wingnut Scandal Thread.

The "report" was not from a trained scientist.
poor, pathetic 'bots are simply gluttons for self-humiliation.

Quote:
Carlin is a senior operations research analyst who has worked in EPA's economics office since 1983. He has a doctorate in economics and a bachelor's degree in physics. He specializes in cost-benefit analysis and the economics of global climate change control, EPA said. The co-author of the report, John Davidson, is an environmental scientist in the economics office who holds a doctorate in physics. Davidson also joined the program in 1983.
^from those renowned 'wingnut scandal' proponents at the NYT.


Quote:
"The individual in question is not a scientist and was not part of the working group dealing with this issue.
Quote:
Carlin is a senior operations research analyst who has worked in EPA's economics office since 1983. He has a doctorate in economics and a bachelor's degree in physics. He specializes in cost-benefit analysis and the economics of global climate change control, EPA said. The co-author of the report, John Davidson, is an environmental scientist in the economics office who holds a doctorate in physics. Davidson also joined the program in 1983.
Quote:
Nevertheless the document he submitted was reviewed by his peers and agency scientists, and information from that report was submitted by his manager to those responsible for developing the proposed endangerment finding. In fact, some ideas from that document are included and addressed in the endangerment finding"
naturally, the EPA's desperate attempt at ass-coverage is greeted with open arms by paddy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 09:58 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,555,075 times
Reputation: 29287
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
I expect Declan McCullagh is being investigated as we speak.
i've noticed google has been pretty slow today.

i've got 10 to 1 odds that in the next three days, we'll be seeing some hilarious smear attempt against carlin and davidson by the rabid o-bot denizens of the daily kossack and huff&puff who are currently googling maniacally from their basements across the nation.

pretty soon we'll know whether either of these EPA employees wet the bed as children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 10:01 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,555,075 times
Reputation: 29287
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
.....the bogus report had no scientific evidence....
i'm looking at page after page of scientific evidence.

take a look. unless you're afraid to, that is...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 10:03 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,978,392 times
Reputation: 4555
Just as your post indicates. Both were working economists with the EPA not involved in Global warming science. Their degrees may impress you but they were not experts on global warming. Their report was not peer reviewed and produced new scientific data.

This is simple. Wingnuts don't understand how scientific reports are produced. They can't get the simple concept that you don't take opinion pieces from non experts not involved in the scientific field from which the report comes from.

A great example of why right wing propaganda is able to fool Millions of ignorants.

The issue is just too complex for them to figure out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 10:07 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,978,392 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
i'm looking at page after page of scientific evidence.

take a look. unless you're afraid to, that is...
To an uneducated fool that would look like scientific data.

You have no idea what that means. They offerred rehashed diatribe from kooky right wing scientific outcasts....LOL

It simply goes over your head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 10:07 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
i've noticed google has been pretty slow today.

i've got 10 to 1 odds that in the next three days, we'll be seeing some hilarious smear attempt against carlin and davidson by the rabid o-bot denizens of the daily kossack and huff&puff who are currently googling maniacally from their basements across the nation.

pretty soon we'll know whether either of these EPA employees wet the bed as children.
The funniest thing about this whole thing is that a man has a BS in physics and is called a non-scientist. They call people who don't know their butt from page nine but agree with the UN to get more UN grants scientists. We have a number of world renowned climatologists in this country who don't agree with Algore and his people so lefties say they know nothing. I love their thinking but wonder how they manage to believe themselves.

All this thing was supposed to do was get the EPA to discuss some of the newer knowledge from real climatologists who don't get UN grants to pay their salaries and they panicked and ran to the recently passed climate bill that will actually break up our nation. If it weren't so sad I would laugh at them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 10:11 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,978,392 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
The funniest thing about this whole thing is that a man has a BS in physics and is called a non-scientist. They call people who don't know their butt from page nine but agree with the UN to get more UN grants scientists. We have a number of world renowned climatologists in this country who don't agree with Algore and his people so lefties say they know nothing. I love their thinking but wonder how they manage to believe themselves.

All this thing was supposed to do was get the EPA to discuss some of the newer knowledge from real climatologists who don't get UN grants to pay their salaries and they panicked and ran to the recently passed climate bill that will actually break up our nation. If it weren't so sad I would laugh at them.
That's funny to you that someone with a BS in Physics is called a non-scientist????

That's because having a BS in Physics doesn't have a damn thing in the World to do with being a trained scientist much less a Climatologist...LOL

This is what's funny. You wingnuts have no earthly clue what you are talking about.....LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 10:14 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Carlin has more credibility with me then Gore does..self proclaimed "fill in the blank".

Both Gore and Obama are saying carbon dioxide IS not MAY BE the pollutant that we have to control, like it's a done deal, a fact. Science is NEVER a done deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 10:16 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,555,075 times
Reputation: 29287
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
To an uneducated fool that would look like scientific data.
explain please.
which parts are you having difficulty with?


Quote:
You have no idea what that means.
i have no idea what what means? be specific.

Quote:
They offerred rehashed diatribe from kooky right wing scientific outcasts....LOL
they did? how so?
identify the 'diatribe' and name the kooky right wing scientific outcasts who managed to get their research published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

this should be very entertaining.

Quote:
It simply goes over your head.
what goes over my head? which parts of this censored study are you attempting to refute?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top