Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
OK I guess from now on we will have to have test in 4 different forms.........
English for Whites
Spanish for Hispanics
Ebonics for Blacks
Mandarin for Asian
IMO that is even MORE biased than the one given in ONE language, ENGLISH!! If they can't read or understand English, they have NO business taking a fire fighters test anyway.
What exactly are you addressing?
SCOTUS upheld the white firefighters, so you're remark, "from now on" makes no sense. Both whites and minorities passed the test, it was only that white firefighters scored higher consistently that raised the issue of potential racial bias, so the rest of your post makes no sense.
I have a suggestion for the 4 dissenting SCOTUS justices, future justice Sotomayor, all the bleeding hearts, and mostly for the black fellas that failed the test:
Prepare.
That's right- prepare for it. Study. Its an exam. Were it a breeze, they would not give one or some of these guys would have passed. Prepare and pass. Personally, I am a horrid test taker and have had to go to some extraordinary lengths to pass some in the past.
It takes a really deranged sense of fatalism to believe that black men are incapable of passing such a test. Then again, all this inane talk of dialects or cultural bias shows who the real racists are.
it was only that white firefighters scored higher consistently that raised the issue of potential racial bies
no it only shows that some people are smarter and hardworking then,some people who are stupid or lazy.test can not be racially biased but it can only show who is more qualified for job and who is not
How about the fact that when one is considered a minority that they get points before any test or anything. This is true. How do I know?? Because I am a supposed minority. He didn't post lies at all.
Fine, in some situations disadvantaged minorities including
white women, extra points are given.
Why the absence of outrage when white people receive extra points for "legacy admissions" to the top colleges because their grandparents, parents, or great grandparents attended the school.
The policy automatically excludes minorities because these same schools and people made sure none of "us" could attend or graduate from those schools.
You don't see the unfairness of this policy or the intent behind it?
What about getting into a top school because your family made a generous endowment, usually above what minority families can give, any opinion on that?
I personally have no problem with the supreme courts decission, however I find it ironic the hue and cry concearning affirmative action, which this case has no basis in and the overall ignorance and/or amnesia when it comes to the policies that benefit white people.
Fine, in some situations disadvantaged minorities including
white women, extra points are given.
Why the absence of outrage when white people receive extra points for "legacy admissions" to the top colleges because their grandparents, parents, or great grandparents attended the school.
The policy automatically excludes minorities because these same schools and people made sure none of "us" could attend or graduate from those schools.
You don't see the unfairness of this policy or the intent behind it?
What about getting into a top school because your family made a generous endowment, usually above what minority families can give, any opinion on that?
I personally have no problem with the supreme courts decission, however I find it ironic the hue and cry concearning affirmative action, which this case has no basis in and the overall ignorance and/or amnesia when it comes to the policies that benefit white people.
Might have something to do with schools being private institutions versus the fire department, a public institution. Besides, being a legacy only gets you so much.
And most universities and colleges are begging for black students.
"What they need to do is have two test." -5; 'test' should be plural.
"One for the smart people and one for the stupid people." -5; Sentence fragment.
"Kinda like they do for high school sports, have a high standard for the SMART people and a low test score standard for the STUPID people who can play basssetballl and cannot spell their own name." -10; No such words as 'kinda' and 'basssetballl'.
"Or like the SAT's, one group has a high number and one group of people a lower number. Purposely done because one group whines about being never given a chance in life." -20; Two more fragmented sentences, poor punctuation (the comma should be a semicolon) and 'Purposely' is not a word.
"Who would want a stupid ass on a ladder fighting a fire when we all know most of them started the fire to begin with." -5; Punctuation.
"You got it!" -5; Conjugation, tense.
"One side gets the breaks and rewarding for doing terrible and the other deserving side gets screwed." -5; Conjugation.
"That is how affirmative action works. Reward the lesser of the two." -10; Fragmented sentences.
Score: 35.
Grade: F
purposely |ˈpərpəslē|
adverb
on purpose; intentionally : she had purposely made it difficult.
I think the Supremes sent a message to Sotomayor( and hopefully to others such as Eric Holder) that racism and affirmative action are going the way of the dinosaur. Its time to move on and just deal with equality in its purest form.
^And how do you suggest that we deal with equality in its purest form?
~ButterBrownBiscuit~
By....being equal?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.