Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To me what they are saying is it will take a huge kick in America's ass for our federal government to truly look after us not the world. As far as violence is concerned, there is truth to what he says in that if we are going to fight a war because we've been attacked or severally threatened then kick their asses into the next century not nation-build which is what America has done and is doing since WW2 at the expense of the American people. That's how I read it.
I don't. Here's what I hear: "people demand that their government protect them effectively, consistently, and with as much violence as necessary"
Not only is there a wish for Osama Bin Laden to target America, there is also hope for government to take up violence to protect America. War mongering suddenly sounds mild. I don't see anything you do, but treason towards personal political fulfillment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Okiegirlfriend
We don't need Bin Laden to attack America. We have BO!
Wrong. Osama couldn't ask for a better ally than the neo-cons that have been dividing and eating this country from inside.
I don't. Here's what I hear: "people demand that their government protect them effectively, consistently, and with as much violence as necessary"
Not only is there a wish for Osama Bin Laden to target America, there is also hope for government to take up violence to protect America. War mongering suddenly sounds mild. I don't see anything you do, but treason towards personal political fulfillment.
Wrong. Osama couldn't ask for a better ally than the neo-cons that have been dividing and eating this country from inside.
Absolutely correct. Bin Laden is no doubt sitting back in satisfaction, watching the Republican party tear this country apart. The right-wing faction in Congress and elsewhere have been attacking Barack Obama since way before the election. And since he was elected--democratically (which doesn't seem to matter to the right wing)--they have been trying their best to make sure that he fails. They are treasonous in the extreme--and giving great satisfaction to Osama Bin Laden.
Actually, the neocons falsified intell to get us into Iraq. Afghanistan actually had connections to bin Laden.
Nice attempt to redirect what was said. Nowhere did I mention Iraq, you did. Once again, an example of liberals trying to only recognize what they want to say as truth. Regardless of the truth of the matter.
I don't. Here's what I hear: "people demand that their government protect them effectively, consistently, and with as much violence as necessary"
Not only is there a wish for Osama Bin Laden to target America, there is also hope for government to take up violence to protect America. War mongering suddenly sounds mild. I don't see anything you do, but treason towards personal political fulfillment.
Wrong. Osama couldn't ask for a better ally than the neo-cons that have been dividing and eating this country from inside.
It does seem to me they are eerily similar.
Far right wing Religious kooks defending their land at any cost, trying to shape people's visions so they are the same as theirs, shout useless inflamatory rhetoric to show they are devoted, keep adding to this list I know there is more...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
