Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2009, 01:24 PM
 
4,465 posts, read 8,000,367 times
Reputation: 813

Advertisements

No,

I believe Libertarianism is for those who do not understand history, just as the lottery is for those who do not understand statistics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2009, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Inis Fada
16,966 posts, read 34,718,970 times
Reputation: 7724
Quote:
Originally Posted by NintendoTogepi View Post
It has the same problem as communism. Sounds great on paper and in theory. In practice....ehhhhh, no thanks. It's very utopian.
So you would prefer the government regulated every aspect of your life?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 01:49 PM
 
3,292 posts, read 4,474,295 times
Reputation: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhBeeHave View Post
So you would prefer the government regulated every aspect of your life?
I think people would prefer more than one option? It's not like it's full gov't control or no gov't at all, there are levels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 01:51 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,392,719 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
Libertarianism for Rural folks.

Socialism for Urban folks.
See how well the rural folks hold up when their farm subsidies dry up, their electric grids, telephones and internet are taken off line because it is not cost effective, and their roads are not maintained for the same reason. It is simply a fact that rural folks need government far more then urban folks because where as the aforementioned services are profitable to provide in cities they are not profitable to provide in many rural areas without gov't support.

As a southerner who has studied history, I will tell you that the rural South was on par with a third world country prior to the New Deal and benefited greatly from the government investement FDR put into building decent school buildings and electric-ing up the the rural south with the TVA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 01:59 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,205,540 times
Reputation: 5481
I love how threads like this bring the staunch liberals out of the woodwork. I think the majority of libertarians (that I know at least) don't care about political parties and rather vote/act based on what they believe to be best. Unfortunately that cannot be said about the majority of conservatives/liberals...

I think we can all learn that placing a party label on your chest is a very narrow-minded and un-intellectual thing to do. Independant thought is not valued in either the democratic or republican parties anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:04 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,321,408 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by NintendoTogepi View Post
The economy would probably collapse after a few years with no regulation.
Environmental disaster in a lot of areas as well.
When people HAVE to be responsible, they ARE responsible.

Who the hell is responsible for their actions now - The State?

Yes, the State is responsible for your actions under Socialism, which is why they must control every aspect of your life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:07 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,321,408 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
See how well the rural folks hold up when their farm subsidies dry up, their electric grids, telephones and internet are taken off line because it is not cost effective, and their roads are not maintained for the same reason. It is simply a fact that rural folks need government far more then urban folks because where as the aforementioned services are profitable to provide in cities they are not profitable to provide in many rural areas without gov't support.

As a southerner who has studied history, I will tell you that the rural South was on par with a third world country prior to the New Deal and benefited greatly from the government investement FDR put into building decent school buildings and electric-ing up the the rural south with the TVA.
I've always had a problem with wealthy farmers and agribusiness being paid for such things as NOT growing food.

The Fed is a scam in all things it touches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:44 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,392,719 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
I've always had a problem with wealthy farmers and agribusiness being paid for such things as NOT growing food.

The Fed is a scam in all things it touches.
I agree farm subsidies need to be scaled back, however rural areas will soon find themselves living a 19th century existence without federal assistance when it comes to food prices, electricity and infrustructure construction. If they want to go back to no electricity, no indoor plumbing, wild agracultural price variances, limited road access and poor schools that is fine by me, but I think most of them would not like it. Most rural folks I have met are far more populist then libertarian.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
220 posts, read 648,879 times
Reputation: 85
I'm glad someone started this thread. Having been a conservative, I've been thinking about Libertarianism for awhile now.
In a nut shell, I think like this- I am pro constitution but believe in very limited government. I don't think its the governments job to be involved in every aspect of my life nor is it the governments job to subsidize each and every problem in my life with a new program that is going to FIX it for me.
I believe when the framers wrote the constitution they had limited federal government in mind. I believe what ever powers were not specifically designated to the feds was left up to the people and the states. I believe that the federal government should defend our soil and our liberties, and not much else beyond that.
Socially speaking- I have no opinion one way or another on many issues. Gay Marriage- idfc what you do in or out of your bedroom and its not my business anyway, just as its not your business what i do in mine.
Abortion- while i personally dont agree with abortion, i dont think the governement has the right to tell anyone what to do with their bodies. I am prochoice for that reason. As far as late term abortion goes, i think its a slippery slope. at what point do we consider something to be cruel? i detest the idea of late term abortion but again, i think its a slippery slope.

Religiously- I am a Christian but I feel like politics and religion should never be mixed regardless of what the beliefs are. The framers were clear in their ideals in the constitution.

economically- i believe much of what the libertarians believe and am mostly in line with them.

pot- personally i dont care for pot but i also see no problem with legalizing it. I think more people are capable of functioning and contributing to society while smoking pot then drinking. and i think pot kills far fewer people each year than does alcohol, whether its from DUI or Cirrhosis. I haven't met many violent pot heads and have met plenty of violent drunks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 03:01 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,321,408 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
I agree farm subsidies need to be scaled back, however rural areas will soon find themselves living a 19th century existence without federal assistance when it comes to food prices, electricity and infrustructure construction. If they want to go back to no electricity, no indoor plumbing, wild agracultural price variances, limited road access and poor schools that is fine by me, but I think most of them would not like it. Most rural folks I have met are far more populist then libertarian.
If the Government had been intrusive of farmers to the benefit of farmers and consumers in a way that prohibited anything but organic products for human consumption, it would have been a big plus for supporting Socialism.

But sadly, the Government is run BY Corporations FOR Corporations.

A Corporate Charter don't eat nuthin' but money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top