Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: How would you describe your political views?
Communist 1 1.30%
Very liberal 7 9.09%
Liberal 11 14.29%
Left-leaning Moderate 8 10.39%
Centrist 5 6.49%
Right-leaning moderate 10 12.99%
Conservative 12 15.58%
Very conservative 8 10.39%
Statist 1 1.30%
Libertarian 14 18.18%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2009, 12:15 AM
 
Location: Interior alaska
6,381 posts, read 14,560,763 times
Reputation: 3520

Advertisements

Had a 401K, now I have "Change"....

Saw that on a bumper sticker.

Since the new administration with the help of the last one and backed by the Democrat controlled congress for the previous two years, I am not a fan of any of the parties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2009, 01:28 AM
 
Location: Not far from Fairbanks, AK
20,292 posts, read 37,157,521 times
Reputation: 16397
Quote:
Originally Posted by NintendoTogepi View Post
I would consider myself a very liberal Democrat, on almost all issues except for abortion, where I am pro-life, and education, where I believe parents should have a choice to homeschool or send their kids to private school.
There is still hope for you Just kidding. You don't sound too liberal. I have known a lot of Democrats that aren't very liberal. They may be in a couple of issues, but not when families are mentioned. In this case, they lean conservative. I am a conservative (not a Republican, nor Democrat), but to perhaps the age of 40 I was somewhat liberal (vote Democrat along the crowds in some blue States). My wife has always been conservative, and Christian, and as I got to know her better each day I realized that she always made the right choices on everything she did (and does to this day). It's like another sense to her: she thinks carefully, and comes with the right solution each time. Needless to say, as I aged I changed my ways
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:01 AM
 
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
7,731 posts, read 13,424,908 times
Reputation: 5983
Very, very liberal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:13 AM
 
2,661 posts, read 2,902,531 times
Reputation: 366
No Fascist selection?
Socialist?
Totalitarian, or Authoritarian?

This poll discriminates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:49 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,013 posts, read 14,188,739 times
Reputation: 16727
[] NONE OF THE ABOVE

My non-partisan apolitical philosophy is simple:
"All law is the protection of property rights, all else is policy, and policy requires consent."
Or as stated in the Declaration of Independence:
Job #1 : Secure rights,
Job #2 : Govern those who consent.

Or as the founding generation understood it:

Virginia Constitution, 1776.
SEC. 6. That elections of members to serve as representatives of the people, in assembly, ought to be free; and that all men, having sufficient evidence of permanent common interest with, and attachment to, the community, have the right of suffrage, and cannot be taxed or deprived of their property for public uses, without their own consent, or that of their representatives so elected, nor bound by any law to which they have not, in like manner, assembled, for the public good.
All men ... cannot be taxed without their own consent.
All men ... cannot be deprived of their property for public uses without their own consent.
All men ... cannot be bound by any law that is not for the public good.

Governments that respect the private property rights of the people are a benign but necessary evil.
Governments that destroy private property rights are tyrannical beasts.

In American law, we know that the constitutional government has promised to secure private property rights.

Amendment V, US Constitution 1789
... nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
From the Communist manifesto:
"In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."
COMMUNISM - the ownership of property, or means of production, distribution and supply, by the whole of a classless society, with wealth shared on the principle of 'to each according to his need', each yielding fully 'according to his ability'.
- - - Webster's Dictionary.

SOCIALISM - A political and economic theory advocating collective ownership of the means of production and control of distribution. It is based upon the belief that all, while contributing to the good of the community, are equally entitled to the care and protection which the community can provide.
--- Webster's dictionary

Since 1935, the USA has been a socialist nation, where no one (who volunteered via FICA) has private property rights. For when the socialist government takes property for failure to pay socialist taxes, or as punishment for those who violate socialist rules, the government does not pay JUST COMPENSATION.
If there is no private property, connect the dots....

Welcome to the United Socialist States of America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 02:54 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,170 posts, read 19,174,827 times
Reputation: 14874
Quote:
Originally Posted by starlite9 View Post
Had a 401K, now I have "Change"....

Saw that on a bumper sticker.

Since the new administration with the help of the last one and backed by the Democrat controlled congress for the previous two years, I am not a fan of any of the parties.
My 401K turned into a 40.1K last fall.

Since the election it has rebounded and is now above where it left off nearly a year ago. I lost some momentum, but it could have been a lot worse, especially if McCain had won and allowed the auto companies to melt down.

Maybe you need to change your investment mix.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 03:07 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,473,557 times
Reputation: 4185
Basically libertarian in ideals, but voting predominantly Democrat since 2002 because the Democrats are merely statists, while the Republicans are both statists and mentally disturbed warmongers and torturers.

I'm an advocate of so-called "isolationism".

I also find abortion personally abhorrent, although I would be against its criminalization.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 03:56 AM
 
Location: Rural Northern California
1,020 posts, read 2,753,956 times
Reputation: 833
I'm a conservative libertarian (registered Libertarian). I used to consider myself a full-on Republican (before I was old enough to vote), but after I started looking at the issues more in depth, I couldn't in good conscience call myself a Republican. Modern Republicans (specifically neocons) seem to support big government as long as it helps their agenda, and that's just not something I could reconcile with my core principles. At least Libertarians are ideologically consistent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 04:00 AM
 
Location: ✶✶✶✶
15,216 posts, read 30,545,629 times
Reputation: 10851
I don't know, I don't put a whole lot of thought into it. I don't like categories much.

Maybe somebody else can label me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 04:24 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,218,480 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by NintendoTogepi View Post
I would consider myself a very liberal Democrat, on almost all issues except for abortion, where I am pro-life, and education, where I believe parents should have a choice to homeschool or send their kids to private school.
I like most of the libertarian platform but they have some way out there positions same thing with the constitutional party. I vote 70% republican 15% libertarian Adan 15% Democratic.
I try to vote for every non incumbent. Congress was meant to be a temporary position not a career. We need to put in place term limits. Since the fools will not do that as they love the money train we need to vote as if there were.
I am pro life and as strong anti death penalty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top