Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-04-2009, 12:40 PM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,445,519 times
Reputation: 3050

Advertisements

Without passing judgment on the individuals involved, let us pause to review the details so far on next year’s United States Senate race in New York.

First, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton resigns, mere months ago, to become secretary of state for President Obama. Then Gov. David Paterson (who was not elected but took over after Eliot Spitzer resigned in disgrace), appoints a new senator after an extraordinarily inept selection process.
His choice is Representative Kirsten Gillibrand, an upstate Democrat in a conservative district.
And in the current episode, Ms. Gillibrand has to run for the office next year, her first statewide race.

It was hard to know what standards of qualification Mr. Paterson applied when he elevated Ms. Gillibrand.
It’s just as hard to fathom why President Obama and his team are now trying to stop other Democrats from challenging the appointed senator.

If that sounds heavy-handed and undemocratic, it is. An election should offer choices.



http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/04/opinion/04sat2.html?th&emc=th
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-04-2009, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,345,971 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
Without passing judgment on the individuals involved, let us pause to review the details so far on next year’s United States Senate race in New York.

First, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton resigns, mere months ago, to become secretary of state for President Obama. Then Gov. David Paterson (who was not elected but took over after Eliot Spitzer resigned in disgrace), appoints a new senator after an extraordinarily inept selection process.
His choice is Representative Kirsten Gillibrand, an upstate Democrat in a conservative district.
And in the current episode, Ms. Gillibrand has to run for the office next year, her first statewide race.

It was hard to know what standards of qualification Mr. Paterson applied when he elevated Ms. Gillibrand.
It’s just as hard to fathom why President Obama and his team are now trying to stop other Democrats from challenging the appointed senator.

If that sounds heavy-handed and undemocratic, it is. An election should offer choices.



http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/04/opinion/04sat2.html?th&emc=th

Nothing new. It goes on all the time, both in federal and local politics.
Sometimes the party withholds funding, sometimes they will get their friends to do attack ads. Sometimes, higher ups (including the president) will have a little chat, to persuade them to step back. Didn't start yesterday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 01:02 PM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,445,519 times
Reputation: 3050
Quote:
Originally Posted by plannine View Post
Nothing new. It goes on all the time, both in federal and local politics.
Sometimes the party withholds funding, sometimes they will get their friends to do attack ads. Sometimes, higher ups (including the president) will have a little chat, to persuade them to step back. Didn't start yesterday.
Interesting how you on the left think that the President should be telling who can and should run for a Senatorial office and who should not!

If this was Palin doing this in Alaska you all would be frothing even more than you are now about her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top