Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2009, 12:07 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,264,475 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
As usual, you're right. I bow to your greatness and superiority.

I also just noticed that the unemployment rate consistently went downward while Clinton was president, and as soon as Bush took office, it began to climb back up. But I'm sure that's the fault of Democrats and liberals too, right?

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/UNRATE.txt

Let me see if I understand now. I'm a Democrat, so you'll have to forgive me - I'm a slow learner. I think the lesson you're trying to teach us is this: When the economy is getting better under Democrats, it's really the Republicans who deserve the credit, and when the economy is getting worse under Republicans, it's really the Democrats who deserve the blame. Do I have it right?
I don't remember that time the economy got better under Dems. Now don't you go saying it was Clinton, when you know that Republicans controlled the last 6 years of his administration. Lets just say that they worked better with him than the Dems today do with the Republicans.

I remember that things weren't so hot with Eisenhower his first two years when Republicans controlled Congress and got better and better after the Dems took back over. Could it be that sometimes the parties work with whoever is President and others they don't? I sure think that is true. Maybe the Republicans will take one house back in 2010, especially if the dems manage to bring Crap and Tax to fruition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2009, 12:09 AM
 
Location: Boise
4,426 posts, read 5,918,563 times
Reputation: 1701
ok.. so your right wingers want to call a bubble solid economic activity????
you do realize that the stock market, not to mention housing markets are falling to levels pre-bush administration... so basically the entire "great economy" time period you're speaking of was nothing more than smoke and mirrors...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2009, 12:25 AM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,667,610 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I don't remember that time the economy got better under Dems. Now don't you go saying it was Clinton, when you know that Republicans controlled the last 6 years of his administration.
The unemployment rate began to fall the first month that Clinton took office, and then continued to drop until the first month Bush took office.

Economies do rise and fall under both Republicans and Democrats. The lengths to which some people go to ignore this fact is astonishing to me.

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/UNRATE.txt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2009, 04:44 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,151,733 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingForward View Post
Actually, what you first need to do is take a few courses in economics and history.

Under Bush: Low unemployment due to artificially bloated market.

Under Obama: Attempt to address Bush's exploded phony market.


Btw, what were the unemployment figures in January 2009?
For the life of me I dont see how this is difficult to understand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2009, 04:51 AM
 
11,155 posts, read 15,705,136 times
Reputation: 4209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
McCain did not win, so what does that have to do with anything at all?

The fact is Obama promised himself into a job that was way over his head and promised he would run our country on a budget and fix everything under the sun.

The fact that he has spent us into trillions and nothing to show for it is totally his fault and it is also your lib controlled congress fault for allowing him the change to trash the country and put us in such debt that we may never recover from.

This mess is Obamas and is the liberals fault, like it or not.
I really don't think you understand economics very well. I don't mean that as an insult, but the notion that you could blame Obama for this bubble market that began years before really undermines your credibility.

Granted, the stimulus may not be as effective as they'd hoped, but then neither was Bush's $700 billion stimulus. So, perhaps it's simply a market problem that needs to play itself out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2009, 05:19 AM
 
24,404 posts, read 23,065,142 times
Reputation: 15013
You're confusing people with facts, Sunny Days. But watching people do mental gymnastics to defend the ever increasing mess Obama is causing is kind of fun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2009, 05:30 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,151,733 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
You're confusing people with facts, Sunny Days. But watching people do mental gymnastics to defend the ever increasing mess Obama is causing is kind of fun.
Dec. 17, 2008:
What many Americans have felt all year is now official: The U.S. economy has been in a recession since December 2007.

The last business cycle that ended in December 2007 was marked by the weakest employment growth since the Great Depression, flat wages, declining benefit coverage, and deep indebtedness—in short, we are woefully unprepared for the current crisis. As the labor market recession accelerates, more and more families are succumbing to the pressures, declaring bankruptcy, and defaulting on their loans. Policymakers need to step in before the current economic downturn becomes even longer, deeper, and more painful for more Americans.

1. Job losses accelerate. The U.S. economy lost 1.9 million jobs in the first 11 months of 2008, including 533,000 jobs in November. This was the largest negative job growth rate since May 1980. Almost half of all job losses in 2008—44.6%—came during the last two months.
Economic Snapshot for December 2008

By Jan 2009 the official unemployment rate was
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
7.6%
January Unemployment Rate Hits 7.6 Percent: What You Need to Know - US News and World Report

So... please explain how all this was Obama's fault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2009, 05:37 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,151,733 times
Reputation: 6195
As for the D-controlled Congress since 2006, please indicate what enacted legislation created the economic mess Obama is trying to clean up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/109th_C...or_legislation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/110th_c...or_legislation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_C...or_legislation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2009, 05:39 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,750,872 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingForward View Post
Actually, what you first need to do is take a few courses in economics and history.

Under Bush: Low unemployment due to artificially bloated market.

Under Obama: Attempt to address Bush's exploded phony market.

Btw, what were the unemployment figures in January 2009?
Now isn't that what Republicans said about Clinton's "surplus"? Wasn't it based on the tech bubble? I recall Dems dismissing that thought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2009, 05:43 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,750,872 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
After Ronald Reagan took office, the unemployment rate went up to 10.8%.

What was the worst unemployment rate under Carter? 7.8%.

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/UNRATE.txt

In fact, the economy under Reagan grew worse for 2 years straight, and during those first two years, Reagan blamed all of the economic problems on Carter. It wasn't until 1983 that things began to get better.

So whine all you want, Obama-haters, there's plenty of time for the economy to get better and for Obama to win a second term.

Don't forget how Reagan fixed the economy. Massive tax cuts (don't even try it, revenue went up). What are we doing now, an orgy of spending that will require tax increases. All his moves are job killers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top