Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga
molecular biologist. i have some friends working at NOAA and JPL.
i hate to add to your terror, but there are skeptics there as well
no need. but let me know if he starts posting on the bb, i'll send him a DM.
does it bother you that mr. wilson has no degree in climatology?
how is my posting on this forum 'impeding progress'? be specific, please.
terrified people rarely think clearly. get a grip.
half-brained people are easily terrified. good point.
glad mine is entire and intact..
|
No, it doesn't bother me. Because Wilson actually sees and documents the effects of climate change (and all the things that lead to it, including deforestation) on the species he studies (noting that we are losing 100 species per day to extinction).
I guess all of these people have only "half a brain," too. I'm sure they would appreciate the knowledge you have that has, apparently, been kept from them:
Here is a list of organizations that accept anthropogenic global warming as real and scientifically well-supported:
NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS):
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/edu/gwdebate/
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA):
Global Warming Frequently Asked Questions
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC):
Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis
National Academy of Sciences (NAS):
Nat'l Academies Press Collection: Global Warming/Climate Change Collection
State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC) - http://www.socc.ca/permafrost/permafrost_future_e.cfm (broken link)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA):
Climate Change | U.S. EPA
The Royal Society of the UK (RS) -
http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=3135
American Geophysical Union (AGU): http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/climate_change_position.html (broken link)
American Meteorological Society (AMS):
Climate Change Research: Issues for the Atmospheric and Related Sciences Adopted by the AMS Council 9 February 2003
American Institute of Physics (AIP):
Statement on Human Impacts on Climate Change - American Institute of Physics
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR):
How Does Climate Change?
American Meteorological Society (AMS):
Joint Academies' Statement
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS):
Climate Change Policy
Every major scientific institution dealing with climate, ocean, and/or atmosphere agrees that the climate is warming rapidly and the primary cause is human CO2 emissions. In addition to that list, see also this joint statement (PDF) that specifically and unequivocally endorses the work and conclusions of the IPCC Third Assessment report. The statement was issued by:
Academia Brasiliera de Ciencias (Brazil)
Royal Society of Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Academie des Sciences (France)
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
Indian National Science Academy
Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
Science Council of Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society (United Kingdom)
National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
You can also read this statement [PDF], which includes all the above signatories plus the following:
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy Council of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
But if scientists are too liberal and politicians too unreliable, perhaps you find the opinion of key industry representatives more convincing:
BP, the largest oil company in the UK and one of the largest in the world, has this opinion:
There is an increasing consensus that climate change is linked to the consumption of carbon based fuels and that action is required now to avoid further increases in carbon emissions as the global demand for energy increases.
Shell Oil (yes, as in oil, the fossil fuel) says:
Shell shares the widespread concern that the emission of greenhouse gases from human activities is leading to changes in the global climate.
Eighteen CEOs of Canada's largest corporations had this to say in an open letter to the Prime Minister of Canada:
Our organizations accept that a strong response is required to the strengthening evidence in the scientific assessments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). We accept the IPCC consensus that climate change raises the risk of severe consequences for human health and security and the environment. We note that Canada is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.
Have the environazis seized the reigns of industrial power, in addition to infiltrating the U.N., the science academies of every developed nation, and the top research institutes of North America? That just doesn't seem very likely.