Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-09-2009, 10:17 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,659,127 times
Reputation: 7943

Advertisements

"As California lawmakers struggle with a budget gap now grown to $26.3 billion, one of the hottest topics for many taxpayers is the cost to the state of illegal immigrants.

The question of whether taxpayers should provide services to illegal residents became a major political issue in California's last deep recession, culminating in the ballot fight over Proposition 187 in 1994. That history could repeat itself in the current downturn, as activists opposed to illegal immigration have launched a campaign for an initiative that would, among other things, cut off welfare payments to the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants. Those children are eligible for welfare benefits because they are U.S. citizens."


Deficit may trigger anti-illegal immigration ballot measure - Los Angeles Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2009, 06:41 PM
 
Location: mancos
7,786 posts, read 8,024,746 times
Reputation: 6650
ha ha freeloaders have more rights than hard working Americans in cali dream on
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2009, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,453,455 times
Reputation: 4586
Good luck with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2009, 06:58 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,659,127 times
Reputation: 7943
If this proposition passed, I bet it would be overturned, but even if it wasn't overturned, I think it would cause more problems than its worth.

Picking on the children of illegal immigrants isn't the answer. The answer is to stop illegal immigrants from entering the country in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2009, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,453,455 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
If this proposition passed, I bet it would be overturned, but even if it wasn't overturned, I think it would cause more problems than its worth.

Picking on the children of illegal immigrants isn't the answer. The answer is to stop illegal immigrants from entering the country in the first place.
The answer is also to get the ones who are in the country out. This should be done by focusing on their employers and, yes, on any welfare they may be receiving - even if it is unfair to their kids.

Ideally, the illegal aliens should all be rounded up and deported (unrealistic, but I can dream, can't I? ). If their children are citizens, they should be allowed to have them remain in the US with legal family or friends or in foster care (yes, it would cost money, but it would be worth it to get the illegals out) or to take them with them. The illegals should not be allowed to remain, nor should they be allowed any benefits whatsoever. PERIOD.

This problem should be stopped as it applies to future births. No more birthright citizenship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2009, 07:09 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,314,292 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
The answer is also to get the ones who are in the country out. This should be done by focusing on their employers and, yes, on any welfare they may be receiving - even if it is unfair to their kids.
Could California ever get that desperate?

Wouldn't it sell the redwoods first?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2009, 07:18 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,659,127 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
The answer is also to get the ones who are in the country out. This should be done by focusing on their employers and, yes, on any welfare they may be receiving - even if it is unfair to their kids.

Ideally, the illegal aliens should all be rounded up and deported (unrealistic, but I can dream, can't I? ). If their children are citizens, they should be allowed to have them remain in the US with legal family or friends or in foster care (yes, it would cost money, but it would be worth it to get the illegals out) or to take them with them. The illegals should not be allowed to remain, nor should they be allowed any benefits whatsoever. PERIOD.

This problem should be stopped as it applies to future births. No more birthright citizenship.
I agree with you on not granting birthright citizenship, but I don't think the political will is there to deport the illegals or cut off their benefits. I do think that it would be politically feasible to strengthen our borders. I'm sure that the vast majority of our population - even illegal immigrants - would support that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2009, 08:22 PM
 
Location: West Texas
958 posts, read 2,132,455 times
Reputation: 1215
If it goes well with Michael Jackson's they could auction off celebrity funerals to the public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2009, 08:34 PM
 
1,117 posts, read 1,993,889 times
Reputation: 982
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
The answer is also to get the ones who are in the country out. This should be done by focusing on their employers and, yes, on any welfare they may be receiving - even if it is unfair to their kids.

Ideally, the illegal aliens should all be rounded up and deported (unrealistic, but I can dream, can't I? ). If their children are citizens, they should be allowed to have them remain in the US with legal family or friends or in foster care (yes, it would cost money, but it would be worth it to get the illegals out) or to take them with them. The illegals should not be allowed to remain, nor should they be allowed any benefits whatsoever. PERIOD.

This problem should be stopped as it applies to future births. No more birthright citizenship.
Absolutely
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2009, 08:37 PM
 
1,117 posts, read 1,993,889 times
Reputation: 982
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
I agree with you on not granting birthright citizenship, but I don't think the political will is there to deport the illegals or cut off their benefits. I do think that it would be politically feasible to strengthen our borders. I'm sure that the vast majority of our population - even illegal immigrants - would support that.
The problem with just focusing on border control is the fact that close to 1/3 of all illegal aliens in the U.S. didn't cross the border illegally. They overstayed their visas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top