Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-15-2009, 11:44 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,588,653 times
Reputation: 2823

Advertisements

Since there was a thread last week about whether or not people like O'Reilly look out for the little guy versus big corporations, I thought I would post a link to his Talking Points on Cap and Trade and ask whether this angle has been covered by the media that is supposedly looking out for the little guy. Also, has the party that is supposedly standing up for the working man had anyone ask questions like this?

The Cap-and-Trade Corruption - Bill O'Reilly | The O'Reilly Factor - FOXNews.com


"Now, less gunk in the air is good. A cleaner planet means better health for all of us. But already, India, China, Mexico and other countries have told President Obama they will not limit emissions. They don't really care about global warming. So even if we cap-and-trade all day long, the Earth will continue to be dirty."

"Goldman Sachs is a goliath investment company that pays very little tax. In fact, last year in the teeth of the recession, Goldman made more than $2 billion in profit and, according to the Associated Press, paid its CEO Lloyd Blankfein about $43 million. Let me repeat: Old Lloyd made $43 million bucks in 2008. But Goldman Sachs paid zero in federal income tax. Let me repeat: Goldman made $2 billion and paid nothing in federal tax.

A quick aside: President Obama and the Democrats want to raise taxes on high-earning Americans to pay for health care. But Goldman-Sachs gets a pass.

Back to cap-and-trade. Goldman owns a 10 percent stake in the Chicago Climate Exchange, where the cap-and-trade deals will be made. On each deal a commission will be paid. Goldman Sachs stands to vacuum up money. Did I mention the company pays very little tax?

Also, Goldman employees gave President Obama's campaign close to $1 million. Did I mention that?

Ready for more? Guess who has also invested heavily in cap-and-trade? Hello, Al Gore. He's started a company named Generation Investment Management, which will also profit big time if the cap-and-trade deal becomes law. Since Al Gore launched his global warming crusade, his net worth has increased 5,000 percent to more than $100 million, according to Investors Business Daily. As they say on Wall Street, Mr. Gore is hot. Pardon the pun.

So let's recap. Global warming is bad, but cap-and-trade will not affect it much because China and India will continue to pollute. Big corporations like Goldman Sachs and big guys like Al Gore could make many millions of dollars off cap-and-trade, while the regular folks will pay more for just about everything."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-15-2009, 11:59 AM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,684,460 times
Reputation: 1962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
Since there was a thread last week about whether or not people like O'Reilly look out for the little guy versus big corporations, I thought I would post a link to his Talking Points on Cap and Trade and ask whether this angle has been covered by the media that is supposedly looking out for the little guy. Also, has the party that is supposedly standing up for the working man had anyone ask questions like this?

The Cap-and-Trade Corruption - Bill O'Reilly | The O'Reilly Factor - FOXNews.com


"Now, less gunk in the air is good. A cleaner planet means better health for all of us. But already, India, China, Mexico and other countries have told President Obama they will not limit emissions. They don't really care about global warming. So even if we cap-and-trade all day long, the Earth will continue to be dirty."

"Goldman Sachs is a goliath investment company that pays very little tax. In fact, last year in the teeth of the recession, Goldman made more than $2 billion in profit and, according to the Associated Press, paid its CEO Lloyd Blankfein about $43 million. Let me repeat: Old Lloyd made $43 million bucks in 2008. But Goldman Sachs paid zero in federal income tax. Let me repeat: Goldman made $2 billion and paid nothing in federal tax.

A quick aside: President Obama and the Democrats want to raise taxes on high-earning Americans to pay for health care. But Goldman-Sachs gets a pass.

Back to cap-and-trade. Goldman owns a 10 percent stake in the Chicago Climate Exchange, where the cap-and-trade deals will be made. On each deal a commission will be paid. Goldman Sachs stands to vacuum up money. Did I mention the company pays very little tax?

Also, Goldman employees gave President Obama's campaign close to $1 million. Did I mention that?

Ready for more? Guess who has also invested heavily in cap-and-trade? Hello, Al Gore. He's started a company named Generation Investment Management, which will also profit big time if the cap-and-trade deal becomes law. Since Al Gore launched his global warming crusade, his net worth has increased 5,000 percent to more than $100 million, according to Investors Business Daily. As they say on Wall Street, Mr. Gore is hot. Pardon the pun.

So let's recap. Global warming is bad, but cap-and-trade will not affect it much because China and India will continue to pollute. Big corporations like Goldman Sachs and big guys like Al Gore could make many millions of dollars off cap-and-trade, while the regular folks will pay more for just about everything."

The only one looking out of the little guy is the little guy.
The illusion that the little guys is some how being protected by the government is a lie.
Last time I checked the little guy is still little has been for a very long time.
But if little guys stop giving power to the government to tax the little guy or anyone else, the little guy might actually move ahead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 12:03 PM
 
769 posts, read 887,910 times
Reputation: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by LibertyandJusticeforAll View Post
The only one looking out of the little guy is the little guy.
The illusion that the little guys is some how being protected by the government is a lie.
Last time I checked the little guy is still little has been for a very long time.
But if little guys stop giving power to the government to tax the little guy or anyone else, the little guy might actually move ahead.

For some reason, no one will listen to this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 12:04 PM
 
5,165 posts, read 6,054,529 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by LibertyandJusticeforAll View Post
The only one looking out of the little guy is the little guy.
The illusion that the little guys is some how being protected by the government is a lie.
Last time I checked the little guy is still little has been for a very long time.
But if little guys stop giving power to the government to tax the little guy or anyone else, the little guy might actually move ahead.
unfortunately too many little guys are insecure and need to be helped by the Government. they do not believe in themselves so they put power in Governments hands and then they do not have to make a decision the government will do it for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Sacramento, Ca
2,039 posts, read 3,280,659 times
Reputation: 1661
Quote:
Originally Posted by cleanhouse View Post
unfortunately too many little guys are insecure and need to be helped by the Government. they do not believe in themselves so they put power in Governments hands and then they do not have to make a decision the government will do it for them.
Do you think the .gov fosters that insecurity, in order to gain power?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 12:11 PM
 
5,165 posts, read 6,054,529 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecvMatt View Post
Do you think the .gov fosters that insecurity, in order to gain power?
Of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 12:12 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,131,520 times
Reputation: 9409
It sure is quiet in here. Wonder where the Cap and Trade liberals are today?

They should come marching in a few minutes after Olbermann's had a chance to spew his nonsense.

O'Reilly makes way too much sense sometimes. He's hit the nail right on the head with this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 12:14 PM
 
5,165 posts, read 6,054,529 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
It sure is quiet in here. Wonder where the Cap and Trade liberals are today?

They should come marching in a few minutes after Olbermann's had a chance to spew his nonsense.

O'Reilly makes way too much sense sometimes. He's hit the nail right on the head with this.
O'Reilly is no neocon when it comes to corporate America. He is constantly bashing the oil companies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 12:22 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,131,520 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by cleanhouse View Post
O'Reilly is no neocon when it comes to corporate America. He is constantly bashing the oil companies.
You are correct. He bashes all sorts of companies, especially when the little guy is trampled on. That's how I know that liberals are merely towing the line when they bash O'Reilly. If they actually took the time to listen to him from time to time, they'd see that he's actually more in the center than the Bible (ie. Huffington Post) tells them he is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2009, 12:31 PM
 
551 posts, read 856,058 times
Reputation: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
It sure is quiet in here. Wonder where the Cap and Trade liberals are today?

They should come marching in a few minutes after Olbermann's had a chance to spew his nonsense.

O'Reilly makes way too much sense sometimes. He's hit the nail right on the head with this.
If you want the liberal loonies in here then just change the title to "Obama bashes the little guy..."

Then look out for all of his defenders stumbling over each other to lash out at everyone for bringing the Messiah into this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top