Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-09-2009, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,745,357 times
Reputation: 3146

Advertisements

"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of."

Hot Air » Blog Archive » What did Ginsburg think Roe would do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-09-2009, 02:20 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,012,380 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of."

Hot Air » Blog Archive » What did Ginsburg think Roe would do?
Sounds like it to me. Although most pro-choicers today would not advocate (at least not openly) for eugenics, there was a strong tie in the movement to legalize abortion and the eugenics movement before Roe vs Wade. I personally think that all babies are precious and should be given a chance at life, regardless of skin color or ancestry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 02:24 PM
 
8,624 posts, read 9,085,580 times
Reputation: 2863
The founder of Planned Parenthood, a liberals hero, was a strong advocate for abortion to keep the black population down. Who are the greatest supporters of abortion? Democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 02:50 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
I love how HOT AIR takes a remark, italicizes one word to spin it, and achieves its goal so readily.

My, my, my, my, my, Ruth didn't talk about eugenics at all. The "population" to which she was obviously referring were the impoverished people. The perception she was talking about was single, impoverished women adding children to the welfare rolls. And that later decisions made it clear, women who have money will always have access to healthcare, including abortion, but poor women, and especially poor women in rural areas will not. That's been the result of the laws passed against abortion. They don't impede women with means at all. They force women who are poor and rural to have babies, regardless of the circumstances. Women who are in the worst position to have children are forced to have them. And are subject to all the holier-than-thou platitudes. Oh, those women shouldn't have been having sex if they don't want children. They have to become nuns to earn people's respect. Aren't they lucky?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 03:58 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,464,947 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcsldcd View Post
The founder of Planned Parenthood, a liberals hero, was a strong advocate for abortion to keep the black population down. Who are the greatest supporters of abortion? Democrats.
Margaret Sanger was opposed to abortion. In the so-called Negro Project -- endorsed by such as Eleanor Roosevelt and W.E.B. Dubois -- Sanger sought to bring family planning and birth control (which is what she actually did advocate for) to the last people who were going to get access without her -- black women in the rural South.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 05:06 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,515,251 times
Reputation: 8075
Default Ginsburg; Roe v. Wade to remove undesirables

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
17,764 posts, read 39,717,430 times
Reputation: 8248
not getting the point here ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,515,251 times
Reputation: 8075
Quote:
Originally Posted by domergurl View Post
not getting the point here ...
The founder of Planned Parenhood was pushing abortion to control the black population which at the time was considered undesirables.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 05:25 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,655 posts, read 18,656,890 times
Reputation: 2829
Margaret Sanger was anti-abortion. It was contraception she was pushing.

You should also read the entire quote from Ginsburg from the interview.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,745,357 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
I love how HOT AIR takes a remark, italicizes one word to spin it, and achieves its goal so readily.

My, my, my, my, my, Ruth didn't talk about eugenics at all. The "population" to which she was obviously referring were the impoverished people. The perception she was talking about was single, impoverished women adding children to the welfare rolls. And that later decisions made it clear, women who have money will always have access to healthcare, including abortion, but poor women, and especially poor women in rural areas will not. That's been the result of the laws passed against abortion. They don't impede women with means at all. They force women who are poor and rural to have babies, regardless of the circumstances. Women who are in the worst position to have children are forced to have them. And are subject to all the holier-than-thou platitudes. Oh, those women shouldn't have been having sex if they don't want children. They have to become nuns to earn people's respect. Aren't they lucky?

Well yeah she was saying kill the poor. Is that somehow acceptable in your eyes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top