Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you believe global warming is now occuring?
Yes 201 48.20%
Yes, but it wont be as bad as predicted 63 15.11%
No 135 32.37%
Unsure 18 4.32%
Voters: 417. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-17-2007, 09:21 PM
 
189 posts, read 344,280 times
Reputation: 26

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyPinestra View Post
Dude, 500 years ago I would've been on one of those BOATS!!!
But not me. I'm a bit scared of falling. You would never see me on any Columbus' schooners. I'm too timid for that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-18-2007, 04:59 AM
 
203 posts, read 162,937 times
Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiftShoppeGuy View Post
Science is, and can be a fickle girl..... like with religion, it's meanings and findings can be twisted to meet just about any agenda.
EXACTLY!!! What a great way to put it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2007, 06:48 AM
 
Location: Tampa
3,982 posts, read 10,460,647 times
Reputation: 1200
well, doubt it as you wish, but every day the doubters shrink.

and you will STILL help pay for the solution!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2007, 09:06 AM
 
189 posts, read 344,280 times
Reputation: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue View Post
well, doubt it as you wish, but every day the doubters shrink.

and you will STILL help pay for the solution!
Are you saying that the number of people are believing more in manmade global warming than natural?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2007, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Tampa
3,982 posts, read 10,460,647 times
Reputation: 1200
thats what the stats have been showing

http://www.cnn.com/2007/AUTOS/05/18/bc.fuel.hydrogen.reut/index.html (broken link)

and this is cool!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2007, 11:41 AM
 
189 posts, read 344,280 times
Reputation: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue View Post
thats what the stats have been showing
Well, as the old saying goes: "Don't believe everything you read." Anywho, maybe I should refresh your memory. Here's the list of facts supposedly trying to disprove manmade global warming, as originally posted by Silas777:

Quote:
COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING


MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate.

FACT: Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures. Average ground station readings do show a mild warming of 0.6 to 0.8C over the last 100 years, which is well within the natural variations recorded in the last millennium. The ground station network suffers from an uneven distribution across the globe; the stations are preferentially located in growing urban and industrial areas ("heat islands"), which show substantially higher readings than adjacent rural areas ("land use effects").

There has been no catastrophic warming recorded.



MYTH 2: The "hockey stick" graph proves that the earth has experienced a steady, very gradual temperature increase for 1000 years, then recently began a sudden increase.

FACT: Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time. For instance, the Medieval Warm Period, from around 1000 to1200 AD (when the Vikings farmed on Greenland) was followed by a period known as the Little Ice Age. Since the end of the 17th Century the "average global temperature" has been rising at the low steady rate mentioned above; although from 1940 – 1970 temperatures actually dropped, leading to a Global Cooling scare.

The "hockey stick", a poster boy of both the UN's IPCC and Canada's Environment Department, ignores historical recorded climatic swings, and has now also been proven to be flawed and statistically unreliable as well. It is a computer construct and a faulty one at that.



MYTH 3: Human produced carbon dioxide has increased over the last 100 years, adding to the Greenhouse effect, thus warming the earth.

FACT: Carbon dioxide levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout geologic time. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased. The RATE of growth during this period has also increased from about 0.2% per year to the present rate of about 0.4% per year,which growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years. However, there is no proof that CO2 is the main driver of global warming. As measured in ice cores dated over many thousands of years, CO2 levels move up and down AFTER the temperature has done so, and thus are the RESULT OF, NOT THE CAUSE of warming. Geological field work in recent sediments confirms this causal relationship. There is solid evidence that, as temperatures move up and down naturally and cyclically through solar radiation, orbital and galactic influences, the warming surface layers of the earth's oceans expel more CO2 as a result.



MYTH 4: CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas.

FACT: Greenhouse gases form about 3 % of the atmosphere by volume. They consist of varying amounts, (about 97%) of water vapour and clouds, with the remainder being gases like CO2, CH4, Ozone and N2O, of which carbon dioxide is the largest amount. Hence, CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere. While the minor gases are more effective as "greenhouse agents" than water vapour and clouds, the latter are overwhelming the effect by their sheer volume and – in the end – are thought to be responsible for 60% of the "Greenhouse effect".
Those attributing climate change to CO2 rarely mention this important fact.


MYTH 5: Computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming.

FACT: Computer models can be made to "verify" anything by changing some of the 5 million input parameters or any of a multitude of negative and positive feedbacks in the program used.. They do not "prove" anything. Also, computer models predicting global warming are incapable of properly including the effects of the sun, cosmic rays and the clouds. The sun is a major cause of temperature variation on the earth surface as its received radiation changes all the time, This happens largely in cyclical fashion. The number and the lengths in time of sunspots can be correlated very closely with average temperatures on earth, e.g. the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period. Varying intensity of solar heat radiation affects the surface temperature of the oceans and the currents. Warmer ocean water expels gases, some of which are CO2. Solar radiation interferes with the cosmic ray flux, thus influencing the amount ionized nuclei which control cloud cover.


MYTH 6: The UN proved that man–made CO2 causes global warming.
FACT: In a 1996 report by the UN on global warming, two statements were deleted from the final draft. Here they are:
1) “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases.â€
2) “No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to man–made causesâ€

To the present day there is still no scientific proof that man-made CO2 causes significant global warming.



MYTH 7: CO2 is a pollutant.

FACT: This is absolutely not true. Nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere. We could not live in 100% nitrogen either. Carbon dioxide is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is. CO2 is essential to life on earth. It is necessary for plant growth since increased CO2 intake as a result of increased atmospheric concentration causes many trees and other plants to grow more vigorously. Unfortunately, the Canadian Government has included CO2 with a number of truly toxic and noxious substances listed by the Environmental Protection Act, only as their means to politically control it.


MYTH 8: Global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes.

FACT: There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that supports such claims on a global scale. Regional variations may occur. Growing insurance and infrastructure repair costs, particularly in coastal areas, are sometimes claimed to be the result of increasing frequency and severity of storms, whereas in reality they are a function of increasing population density, escalating development value, and ever more media reporting.



MYTH 9: Receding glaciers and the calving of ice shelves are proof of global warming.

FACT: Glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for hundreds of years. Recent glacier melting is a consequence of coming out of the very cool period of the Little Ice Age. Ice shelves have been breaking off for centuries. Scientists know of at least 33 periods of glaciers growing and then retreating. It’s normal. Besides, glacier's health is dependent as much on precipitation as on temperature.


MYTH 10: The earth’s poles are warming; polar ice caps are breaking up and melting and the sea level rising.

FACT: The earth is variable. The western Arctic may be getting somewhat warmer, due to unrelated cyclic events in the Pacific Ocean, but the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder. The small Palmer Peninsula of Antarctica is getting warmer, while the main Antarctic continent is actually cooling. Ice thicknesses are increasing both on Greenland and in Antarctica.

Sea level monitoring in the Pacific (Tuvalu) and Indian Oceans (Maldives) has shown no sign of any sea level rise.
How do you like those apples? I used to fall for the scam of global warming, but now I'm trying to break that while still being conscious of the environment. I see nothing wrong with alternative fuel sources, regardless of their impact (or lack thereof) on the environment. Conserving energy and forests and all that is, quite frankly, something everyone should do... not just to help curb disasters (or lack thereof), but just to do it. It's good for everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2007, 04:53 PM
 
203 posts, read 162,937 times
Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue View Post
well, doubt it as you wish, but every day the doubters shrink.

and you will STILL help pay for the solution!
You seem excited that everyone is going to have to pay more taxes for nothing.

It's not that I doubt, it's just that the whole thing is ridiculous. Can't you see the points I made? The Earth has been on fire, an ice cube, on fire again and so on, without man around. That you cannot deny. It is how this planet evolved. If the Earth plans on burning again, we cannot stop it by using 1 sheet of toilet paper and farting less. COME ON! Get real!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2007, 09:02 AM
 
9,890 posts, read 10,821,477 times
Reputation: 3108
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue View Post
well, doubt it as you wish, but every day the doubters shrink.

and you will STILL help pay for the solution!
That is precisley what it is about! Just remember this is a political issue not a meterological one! http://www.stuff.co.nz/timaruherald/4064691a6571.html (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2007, 03:06 PM
 
203 posts, read 162,937 times
Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by silas777 View Post
That is precisley what it is about! Just remember this is a political issue not a meterological one! http://www.stuff.co.nz/timaruherald/4064691a6571.html (broken link)
True, but remember...this whole is it real or is it not real thing is ALL politics. It's about power, money and influence. It's not about the planet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2007, 06:46 PM
 
9,890 posts, read 10,821,477 times
Reputation: 3108
Heres more yammering from ALGORES little cheerleader lenny! http://www.thelondonpaper.com/cs/Satellite/london/breakingnews/article/1157203950006?packedargs=suffix%3DBreakingNews (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top