Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2009, 06:23 PM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,445,519 times
Reputation: 3050

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blind Sniper View Post
I say NO. Somebody go ahead and pull the plug on the fat murdering sack of s___. Do the same for Pelosi, Frank & Dodd as well.

I know what your thinking: "Who am I to make such judgements?". I might ask the same question of our government.

Interesting article:

American Thinker: Does Ted Kennedy deserve his extended cancer care?
No the Dem moto for elderly is
"They should die with dignity"

He is terminal and needs to accept that. Or is it different because he is a politician?

 
Old 07-22-2009, 06:25 PM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,445,519 times
Reputation: 3050
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
If he can afford it why not?
Oh well because this pushes up health care.

At least that is what the WH is pushing.
 
Old 07-22-2009, 06:31 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blind Sniper View Post
I say NO. Somebody go ahead and pull the plug on the fat murdering sack of s___. Do the same for Pelosi, Frank & Dodd as well.

I know what your thinking: "Who am I to make such judgements?". I might ask the same question of our government.

Interesting article:

American Thinker: Does Ted Kennedy deserve his extended cancer care?
No, he doesn't, under "Obamacare"; he's too old.

Now, under freedom (the American system) he deserves all he can afford, and then some, because under freedom, no one should be denied health care (regardless of ability to pay). This is the way it always has been, and the way it should remain.

What we need to bring costs down is Tort Reform.
 
Old 07-22-2009, 06:35 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
Judging from your vitriolic post if your name was there instead of Ted Kennedy I would definitely say NO....hypothetically speaking of course.
These people won't buy into what they are offering us; so I say "screw them". If they don't want it, neither do I.
 
Old 07-22-2009, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,465,311 times
Reputation: 4777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blind Sniper View Post
I say NO. Somebody go ahead and pull the plug on the fat murdering sack of s___. Do the same for Pelosi, Frank & Dodd as well.

I know what your thinking: "Who am I to make such judgements?". I might ask the same question of our government.

Interesting article:

American Thinker: Does Ted Kennedy deserve his extended cancer care?

Let me guess? You're a compassionate conservative?
 
Old 07-22-2009, 06:39 PM
 
Location: Orlando
8,276 posts, read 12,858,570 times
Reputation: 4142
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
BS, maybe someday you can get a heart with your health care.

unfortunately that won't resolve compassion or the ability to discern fact from fiction.

He was guilty of cheating and drinking excessively, and poor judgement, murder... nope he didnt do it. and yes I think OJ did, and MJ didn't. The reality is that they did not have charges stick... funny how others did for OJ... Karma has its way of biting you in the a$$.
 
Old 07-22-2009, 06:41 PM
 
79 posts, read 94,165 times
Reputation: 45
Put his large butt in Obama Care and let him wait for his treament.
 
Old 07-22-2009, 06:46 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,018,776 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by idahogie View Post
How do all you decent conservatives feel about being represented by such immoral, scary, and disgusting people? Eliminationism at its finest.

There are decent conservatives here, aren't there?
The OP certainly does not represent me or represent the conservative cause. He is sick, pure and simple.
 
Old 07-22-2009, 06:48 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,018,776 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf View Post
Some of us resent being characterized as group members; instead, we take pride in our individuality. Seems that you do, too. So why give everyone else a hard time about it?

When someone posts something as palpably ugly as the OP, you need to remember the old saying about "there but for the grace of God", etc. Be thankful you're who you are. Don't let the negativity get into your head. That's how you lose -- by becoming part of what you despise.
 
Old 07-22-2009, 07:01 PM
 
Location: Key West
763 posts, read 1,298,648 times
Reputation: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by LML View Post
There are truly some sick, nasty, vile "people" on this forum.
Ted Kennedy is on this forum??
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top