Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Smart move on his part. Even smarter would be for him to not say a word, drink the beer, let the lawyer and union rep do the talking, and walk away when the beer is finished. Why bother talking with two racist. Obama spent so much time apologizing for America, when will he apologize for his own behavior?
Even smarter would be for him to not say a word, drink the beer, let the lawyer and union rep do the talking, and walk away when the beer is finished. Why bother talking with two racist.
No, this would be neurotic, stupid, babyish and unbecoming to a gentleman.
No, this would be neurotic, stupid, babyish and unbecoming to a gentleman.
No, it would be a smart thing to do. Here you have two men who've made up stuff about you and are loved by the press to the point that their every statement is presented as fact before ever hearing the opposing point of view. Any word you say can be twisted by these two and the press will eagerly report whatever Obama and his campaign contributor will say about you. Just drink your beer, keep your mouth shut, and walk away.
I'm anxious to see if Obama's apology tour ended in Russia. It would actually make me happy to hear that he no longer feels the need to apologize (although this is the one situation in which he actually SHOULD apologize).
No, it would be a smart thing to do. Here you have two men who've made up stuff about you and are loved by the press to the point that their every statement is presented as fact before ever hearing the opposing point of view. Any word you say can be twisted by these two and the press will eagerly report whatever Obama and his campaign contributor will say about you. Just drink your beer, keep your mouth shut, and walk away.
"...and keep your mind closed."
Why would you deny him the opportunity to express himself, describe his point of view and talk about his actions, and listen to the other two do the same? Why would you deny them the chance to see common ground, admit mistakes, point out where the other guy went wrong, and laugh and shake hands? Why keep people antagonistic?
They're three men, and Americans together, before they're anything else, sailordave.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
