Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-04-2009, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic east coast
7,115 posts, read 12,654,276 times
Reputation: 16098

Advertisements

Yep, it does vary a lot state-to-state...my DH and I are both in good health, no health conditions, rarely go see a doctor, are self-employed have catastrophic with $2500 deductible for each of us and our premium is approaching $700....we're older, and live in a state that doesn't have the healthiest population...our premium goes up every birthday for each of us...even without any claims...

And we have the choice of only one provider in our small community...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-04-2009, 04:03 PM
 
22,284 posts, read 21,713,925 times
Reputation: 54735
E-health insurance does niot provide insurance, nor are they even a broker. They are sort of like Lending Tree for getting a mortgage. They just alert insurers that you are shopping.

What will happen next is you will start getting calls from health insurance brokers all offering you some version of that plan but prepare for bait and switch. It will not look anything like what you just described.

Also, prepare for the fact that your family members' medical records will be audited and any medical condition for which they have received treatment will be excluded and then some. For instance, a minor who takes medication for depression or any other mental health reason will be excluded from all insurance.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2009, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Illinois Delta
5,767 posts, read 5,013,154 times
Reputation: 2063
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfgod View Post
What state are you in? I've been self-employed, and therefor self-insured for most of my working life. Excellent health, good cholesterol, BP etc. I've been paying over $250/month for catastrophic coverage. That means no Dr. Visits, no prescriptions, $5,000 deductible, then 80/20 after that. Are you telling me you're getting two people with all the stuff you listed for $300?

If so, I'd say good luck with ever getting to collect anything. Lots of companies promise the moon, they just never deliver.

golfgod
************************************************** ******

No kidding! Plus they're smokers! That's an almost guaranteed refusal here. I can remember when we paid insurance companies and, when needed, they paid our claims....makes you wonder how they stayed in business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2009, 04:05 PM
 
Location: San Jose
1,862 posts, read 2,385,154 times
Reputation: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
As a lot of you may know (it's been mentioned a few times in here), I'm self employed and we currently have no health insurance. The last time I priced it was about a year ago, when we started our business. The plans I was looking at then were all over the map, as we weren't sure how fast the business would take off and how much money we'd have to spend on insurance.

With all the talk about health insurance these days, and with all the threads going here discussing the "health care crisis" we are or aren't experiencing and the alleged outrageous cost of plans for those whose employers aren't bearing the brunt, I decided to take another look at the options available and their cost.

What I found was that as long as you're not wanting every single nickle and dime covered, the plans are actually pretty affordable. You do, of course, have to look at the details and really understand what it is you're signing up for, but then, shouldn't you always do that when you're entering into a contract? I would think that would be particularly important when dealing with something as significant as your health. I say this because a big part of the argument for some form of government run health care is that the insurance companies try to weasel out of providing care, and often the care in question isn't covered by the plan. Most people don't read what they sign...

Here's the basics of the plan that best fits our situation. We may or may not purchase this plan in the next month or two - I need to do some more shopping around. The comparison tool I used this afternoon was eHealthInsurance.com. The quote is for two adult smokers and two teenage boys.
  • Office Visits: $35, 2 per year per person
  • Specialists: $35, 2 per year per person
  • Coinsurance: 20% after deductible
  • Annual Deductible: $5,000, $2,500 per person, two persons max
  • Rx: Generic: $15 copay, no brand name coverage
  • Annual out of pocket limit: $3,000 per person + deductible
  • Lifetime Maximum: $3,000,000 per person
  • Out of network coverage: Yes
  • Out of country coverage: Yes, emergency only
  • Primary Care Physician Required: No
  • Specialist Referral Required: No
  • OB/GYN: Basics are 20% coinsurance after deductible
  • Emergency Room: 20% coinsurance after deductible, $500 copay if not admitted
  • Lab/X-ray: 20% coinsurance after deductible if performed within 2 weeks of surgery
  • Outpatient Surgery, Hospitalization: 20% coinsurance after deductible
  • Maternity: Not covered
Cost: $306.94 / month

There are some things in the list I'd like to see tweaked, but it's really not that bad of a deal. It's certainly not indicative of a "crisis." Would it be a free ride if there was a major accident or illness? No. Would it bankrupt us? No. There's enough coverage there to ensure that we'd get the care we need, and we'd just have to tighten our belts for a while.

I do agree that some things could be done to reduce the cost of health care, but I am, and always have been, convinced that there is no "health care crisis" in this country. Despite all the propaganda being thrown about these days, I still haven't seen anything that even comes close to convincing me that the Federal government should get involved. It's not their job, plain and simple, and if they're going to be sticking their hands into an industry that represents as much as 1/6 of our economy, they're going to have to provide a heck of a lot of proof that it's absolutely necessary. If the states want to experiment with some sort of UHC or mandatory coverage ideas, such as Massachusetts has, more power to 'em. I'm all about states' rights, and they have the right to do stuff like that. The Feds don't. It's not their place, and they absolutely should not get involved.
Thanks for the post... I may be opening up myself for ridicule but I don't understand all of the terminology. I've had employer provided insurance for so long that I haven't had to investigate these things much over the last 30+ years. If you don't mind... I'm hoping you could explain some of the terms to me.

First, am I correct in thinking that nobody has a preexisting condition?
Then....
  • Office Visits: $35, 2 per year per person
  • Specialists: $35, 2 per year per person
I assume that would be 2 per year for each of the 4 of you? The two adults and two children.

  • Annual Deductible: $5,000, $2,500 per person, two persons max
There's 4 people being covered... what do they mean by two persons max? What about the other 2?

  • Coinsurance: 20% after deductible
What's coinsurance? You pay 20% of the bill after the $5000?

I think if you answer that I'll be able to understand the other terms.
I hope you don't mind... I just don't understand all of the terms.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2009, 04:07 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,332,595 times
Reputation: 73931
No one wants to hear that, swagger. They only want to hear how horribly unaffordable it all is.

Really, letting people from one state buy insurance in another (every time I pull up plans here in Texas, they are totally reasonable) would really, really help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2009, 04:11 PM
 
8,629 posts, read 9,130,021 times
Reputation: 5978
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
No one wants to hear that, swagger. They only want to hear how horribly unaffordable it all is.

Really, letting people from one state buy insurance in another (every time I pull up plans here in Texas, they are totally reasonable) would really, really help.
Is crossing State lines on the table from either party pertaining to health insurance reform?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2009, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
I don't quite get the deductible and the co-pay. You may end up paying more than you expected. They may find a way to make you pay the entire deductible before you get these $35 dr. visits (the $5000). The lab/X-ray is minimal, if only paid within 2 wks of surgery. The rest will not even count towards the deductible. No brand name drugs? Some have no generic equivalent.

I am fairly healthy, and I only go to the dr. 1-2X/yr. But I take several meds. I have to have regular (twice yearly) bloodwork. That is a lab that would not be covered under your plan. If you get injured and need an X-ray, if it doesn't result in surgery (most don't) , you will have to pay for the X-rays.

Good luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2009, 04:14 PM
 
Location: The beautiful Rogue Valley, Oregon
7,785 posts, read 18,817,826 times
Reputation: 10783
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
As a lot of you may know (it's been mentioned a few times in here), I'm self employed and we currently have no health insurance. The last time I priced it was about a year ago, when we started our business. The plans I was looking at then were all over the map, as we weren't sure how fast the business would take off and how much money we'd have to spend on insurance.
Well, good luck. It looks like you are shopping for a business, rather than individual. My husband and I shopped for an individual plan: we checked with local doctors offices and found more than half of them are not accepting new patients at all, so we limited the search to plans which our current doctor accepted. Out of about 6 plans, we had 3 that we liked, and two of those were well recommended.

Both of them turned us down flat (I have had high blood pressure for about 10 years, controlled by one pill a day, and the spouse had a colonoscopy with a non-cancerous polyp removed 10 years ago, with no further polyps).

Fortunately my husband's former employer had an option for laid-off employees to pick up a catastrophic plan, which we did. Almost $1,000 a month for the two of us, no coverage at all until we hit a $5,000 deductible (per person). And that's all we can get.

We had to question whether it was even worth it - that's almost $17,000 (between the monthly payment and one person's deductible a year). Would it be better to just go without insurance and make up the difference out of savings?

Our neighbor recently went to the hospital with chest pains, and the bill was $7,000. We COULD cover that one bill. One the other hand, the other neighbor has cancer and bills (which Medicare is paying) on the order of $125,000 in the last year +. That we can't cover, not without seriously denting our ability to live retired.

The spouse is looking for another job with insurance, but at 58 in an area with 12% unemployment, that's not happening. I've worked as a contractor for a decade and no job I ever worked had health insurance.

So the final choice is to roll the dice, since we're both in our 50s, and hedge against catastrophic illness by paying $12,000 a year with the expectation that we're probably NOT going to use it. If I could look back 10 years, I wouldn't even bother to carry insurance - we'd never have used this plan. But I have to look forward until we're 65, and that just isn't a good bet.

Last edited by PNW-type-gal; 08-04-2009 at 04:20 PM.. Reason: Wrong per-person deductible: fixed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2009, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
7,835 posts, read 8,435,990 times
Reputation: 8564
Quote:
Originally Posted by PNW-type-gal View Post

Well, good luck. It looks like you are shopping for a business, rather than individual. My husband and I shopped for an individual plan: we checked with local doctors offices and found more than half of them are not accepting new patients at all, so we limited the search to plans which our current doctor accepted. Out of about 6 plans, we had 3 that we liked, and two of those were well recommended.

Both of them turned us down flat (I have had high blood pressure for about 10 years, controlled by one pill a day, and the spouse had a colonoscopy with a non-cancerous polyp removed 10 years ago, with no further polyps).

Fortunately my husband's former employer had an option for laid-off employees to pick up a catastrophic plan, which we did. Almost $1,000 a month for the two of us, no coverage at all until we hit a $7,500 deductible (per person). And that's all we can get.

We had to question whether it was even worth it - that's almost $20,000 (between the monthly payment and one person's deductible a year). Would it be better to just go without insurance and make up the difference out of savings?

Our neighbor recently went to the hospital with chest pains, and the bill was $7,000. We COULD cover that one bill. One the other hand, the other neighbor has cancer and bills (which Medicare is paying) on the order of $125,000 in the last year +. That we can't cover, not without seriously denting our ability to live retired.

The spouse is looking for another job with insurance, but at 58 in an area with 12% unemployment, that's not happening. I've worked as a contractor for a decade and no job I ever worked had health insurance.

So the final choice is to roll the dice, since we're both in our 50s, and hedge against catastrophic illness by paying $12,000 a year with the expectation that we're probably NOT going to use it. If I could look back 10 years, I wouldn't even bother to carry insurance - we'd never have used this plan. But I have to look forward until we're 65, and that just isn't a good bet.
[wing nut hat on] Sux to be you! [/hat off]

swagger can get a family policy for $300/month, so there is no problem with the health care industry. Duh.

Well, he can get a web quote for that, it remains to be seen if he can actually get a policy even remotely like that. Especially if he's ever sneezed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2009, 04:18 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
With all the talk about health insurance these days, and with all the threads going here discussing the "health care crisis" we are or aren't experiencing and the alleged outrageous cost of plans for those whose employers aren't bearing the brunt, I decided to take another look at the options available and their cost.

What I found was that as long as you're not wanting every single nickle and dime covered, the plans are actually pretty affordable...
DM me the name of the company, and I will pass it down to someone I know in Henderson. She could use it.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top