Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't understand the purpose of this thread? That's an article from July 7th about Palin's resignation. Is there some current relevancy to it?
What is the purpose of any thread?
What is the purpose of those stupid "A REAL Letter to NOT Prove a Point" threads????
From the linked article,
"Freedom from government is her battle cry until a vagina gets involved and then watch how much involvement she wants. Show me a woman who is making a private medical decision to end a pregnancy and I’ll show you a Palin screaming for more government involvement.""
The "purpose" of the thread is to call attention to the incomparable wit of MargaretandHelen. Is that a problem?
Well it might not be, if you had bothered to put some original text, or your own commentary, in the OP. Perhaps then we might know what, if anything, to specifically address in that old link.
I suspect your only purpose was some kind of tit for tat, though, which I think is counterproductive. But since I can't tell squat from your original post, I don't know whether you're making a legitimate point that I'd like to respond to, or being a troll, in which case I can just ignore this thread.
Well it might not be, if you had bothered to put some original text, or your own commentary, in the OP. Perhaps then we might know what, if anything, to specifically address in that old link.
I suspect your only purpose was some kind of tit for tat, though, which I think is counterproductive. But since I can't tell squat from your original post, I don't know whether you're making a legitimate point that I'd like to respond to, or being a troll, in which case I can just ignore this thread.
What is your problem? People create posts all the time with just links in them.
You can "suspect" anything you want to "suspect." I told you what "the point" of the thread was. If you don't have anything to respond to, then don't respond!
[quote=Jill61;10213760]Well it might not be, if you had bothered to put some original text, or your own commentary, in the OP. Perhaps then we might know what, if anything, to specifically address in that old link.
I suspect your only purpose was some kind of tit for tat, though, which I think is counterproductive. But since I can't tell squat from your original post, I don't know whether you're making a legitimate point that I'd like to respond to, or being a troll, in which case I can just ignore this thread.[/quote]
Please do...it's for people with a sense of humor.......
Sorry clicking on a perfectly readable link is beyond your computer......
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
great stuff!
