Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-14-2009, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
8,299 posts, read 8,589,545 times
Reputation: 3663

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
The answer is simple - Palin frightens the leftists because socialism is supposed to entice women. The whole notion of being "taken care of" presses the "right buttons".

Of course, the matriarchy embraced socialism - for the good of the children. But the matriarchy forgot to consider that when the "system" starts taking food from their children's mouths for the "more deserving", the scam unravels the deep dark secret.

Socialism is piracy, where the stolen booty is shared among the crew, after a hefty share is taken by the captain and officers. No one "volunteers" to be robbed by socialist government - it requires naked threats of force. And in America's unique case, 3 generations of clever propaganda to hide that socialism was instituted "by consent" via FICA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Check the record, yourself.
In 1930 actuarial statistics, the average male lifespan was 62 years.
The official retirement age of 65 set for Socialist Insecurity was tacit acknowledgment that the majority of the workforce (male) would be dead before collecting one dime, while the survivors' benefit for spouses (female) made them the gender most likely to benefit MOST.

It's no surprise that Socialism appealed to the matriarchy.
1. You really shouldn't use terms, which you clearly do not understand.

2. You have an obvious issue with women, most likely because of chronic rejection and/or impotency issues. The lack of power on the part of men in the situations you present in your posts makes either a possibility, though I'm willing to bet it's a combination of both.

Last edited by helenejen; 08-14-2009 at 03:14 PM..

 
Old 08-14-2009, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,950 posts, read 22,048,638 times
Reputation: 13761
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Lol, Sarah? You might as well say the power of Michelle Malkin. It's a sop to the crazy town hall people willing to kill over it -- the usual right wing media working the poor old sheep until they start biting each other.

Obama said something about it in an interview a couple of weeks ago, that I linked to then but cant find now -- something like, "If the language bothers folks that much I think [the bill writers] would consider changes." I have to find it though. But he certainly wasnt upset.
Did Sarah write about the "death panels" in her facebook page, and demand they be removed, and only a couple days later the house removed all of it from their version of the healthcare bill? Yes. End of line....
 
Old 08-14-2009, 03:58 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,082,216 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Did Sarah write about the "death panels" in her facebook page, and demand they be removed, and only a couple days later the house removed all of it from their version of the healthcare bill? Yes. End of line....
Sorry. The whole "Obama Wants to Kill Grandma" lie had caught on and was building up for about a week before Sarah piled on.

I do admit "death panel" was a great catchphrase, though, and served its purpose on you poor suckers: Did you know Trig's mom was for death panels before she was against them?
 
Old 08-14-2009, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
18,918 posts, read 14,102,000 times
Reputation: 16631
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenejen View Post
Originally Posted by jetgraphics
Quote:
The answer is simple - Palin frightens the leftists because socialism is supposed to entice women. The whole notion of being "taken care of" presses the "right buttons".

Of course, the matriarchy embraced socialism - for the good of the children. But the matriarchy forgot to consider that when the "system" starts taking food from their children's mouths for the "more deserving", the scam unravels the deep dark secret.

Socialism is piracy, where the stolen booty is shared among the crew, after a hefty share is taken by the captain and officers. No one "volunteers" to be robbed by socialist government - it requires naked threats of force. And in America's unique case, 3 generations of clever propaganda to hide that socialism was instituted "by consent" via FICA.
Originally Posted by jetgraphics
Quote:
Check the record, yourself.
In 1930 actuarial statistics, the average male lifespan was 62 years.
The official retirement age of 65 set for Socialist Insecurity was tacit acknowledgment that the majority of the workforce (male) would be dead before collecting one dime, while the survivors' benefit for spouses (female) made them the gender most likely to benefit MOST.

It's no surprise that Socialism appealed to the matriarchy.
1. You really shouldn't use terms, which you clearly do not understand.

2. You have an obvious issue with women, most likely because of chronic rejection and/or impotency issues. The lack of power on the part of men in the situations you present in your posts makes either a possibility, though I'm willing to bet it's a combination of both.
Disagreeing with the matriarchy does not require an issue with women. There's no argument that men and women evaluate with different rule sets.

SOCIALISM - A political and economic theory advocating collective ownership of the means of production and control of distribution. It is based upon the belief that all, while contributing to the good of the community, are equally entitled to the care and protection which the community can provide.
--- Webster's dictionary

All are equally entitled to the care and protection of the community...

Sounds like something women would all agree to.

"Collective Ownership"...
Who owns you? Your labor? Your property?
The Collective.
Don't believe it?
Stop paying your socialist taxes and observe who really owns your property, your labor, your liberty and your self.

Are you so sure you understand the terms of the compact, now?

In other words, that "warm fuzzy secure feeling" of socialism will sour, once the matriarchy are faced with the collective taking the allegorical food from THEIR CHILDREN to feed "the more deserving" (as defined by that faceless bureaucracy).

It's surprising that Palin has the ovaries to disagree with the matriarchy yearning to be cared for. And the leftist pirates know that she can overturn their carefully crafted argument.
 
Old 08-14-2009, 04:08 PM
 
26,159 posts, read 48,867,893 times
Reputation: 31655
Palin's stupid remarks are all the more telling, since in another thread we've seen the proclamation she signed in 2008 as Gov of AK that URGES "end of life counseling" (ELC). Now suddenly she's against it and calling it death panels, what's going on?

IMO, what's going on is that one of Palin's closest advisors is a PAID operative for the Alliance Defense Fund, a group of lawyers in AZ who are bankrolled by the religious right to insert Dobson and Robertson's view of theology into our public laws. Knowing that, it shows to me that her recent pronouncements are the result of her being owned by the religious right and out to do their bidding.
__________________
- Please follow our TOS.
- Any Questions about City-Data? See the FAQ list.
- Want some detailed instructions on using the site? See The Guide for plain english explanation.
- Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
- Thank you and enjoy City-Data.
 
Old 08-14-2009, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
18,918 posts, read 14,102,000 times
Reputation: 16631
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Shame on you...
You should be grateful to men, and not denigrate them for their greatness.

Why?

Here's a test of values, supposedly ingrained in all human cultures.
It is the privilege of males to sacrifice themselves for women and children. It's enshrined in the axiom: "Women and children into the lifeboat FIRST!"

It's not "equal rights" but unequal duty. Women hold a superior right to life, based on that value system. And any man who acts cowardly, allowing a woman or child to die, to save his own life, is held with great contempt.

[] Do wives have the duty to sacrifice themselves for their husband?
NO.
[] Do children have the duty to sacrifice themselves for their parents?
NO.

So until women surrender their privileged position and accept the equal responsibility to guard men with their precious lives, let's not heap abuse upon menfolk.
 
Old 08-14-2009, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
8,299 posts, read 8,589,545 times
Reputation: 3663
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
SOCIALISM - A political and economic theory advocating collective ownership of the means of production and control of distribution. It is based upon the belief that all, while contributing to the good of the community, are equally entitled to the care and protection which the community can provide.
--- Webster's dictionary
You should try reading books on the topics of political and economic theory regarding socialism and its different configurations and nuisances, instead of using Webster's Dictionary to base your understanding. The same goes for the concepts of 'matriarchy' and 'patriarchy'.

And sorry, but your useless generalizations about women and the obvious passivity of men, under the guise of "matriarchy," only reaffirms my initial assertion about your posts.
 
Old 08-14-2009, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
8,299 posts, read 8,589,545 times
Reputation: 3663
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Shame on you...
You should be grateful to men, and not denigrate them for their greatness.
The only men who need to believe and say such things are men that are not themselves great and thus need to find their imagined greatness through a collective based on the *enis alone.
 
Old 08-14-2009, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
18,918 posts, read 14,102,000 times
Reputation: 16631
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenejen View Post
The only men who need to believe and say such things are men that are not themselves great and thus need to find their imagined greatness through a collective based on the *enis alone.
Your *enis envy is showing... more than your hypocrisy is showing.

But you did excise the part about men obligated to die in defense of women.
If you no longer wish your privileged position, by all means, stop accepting all those perquisites of your gender.

And the next time you see a man being unjustly attacked, don't cower behind your "frailties" and excuse your inaction. And when you are in need of assistance, don't go looking for one of those "big strong men" to serve you.

Because if you won't accept equal duty for equal rights, you are a hypocrite and a scoundrel.

SHAME ON YOU.

Last edited by jetgraphics; 08-14-2009 at 04:54 PM..
 
Old 08-14-2009, 04:53 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
18,918 posts, read 14,102,000 times
Reputation: 16631
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenejen View Post
You should try reading books on the topics of political and economic theory regarding socialism and its different configurations and nuisances, instead of using Webster's Dictionary to base your understanding. The same goes for the concepts of 'matriarchy' and 'patriarchy'.

And sorry, but your useless generalizations about women and the obvious passivity of men, under the guise of "matriarchy," only reaffirms my initial assertion about your posts.
I presume your objection means that other books hide the fact that socialism is piracy, and that socialists are pirates.

Because if you are a socialist, you are opposed to the absolute ownership by individuals, by definition.

And since that is the definition of private property, you are opposed to the fifth amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
You are opposed to the Declaration of Independence, wherein it states that governments are instituted among men to secure their inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property ownership.

You are against natural liberty, when you deny individuals the right to own.
NATURAL LIBERTY - The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, unless by the law of nature. The right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner in which they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere in the equal exercise of the same rights by other men. 1 Blackstone's Commentaries, 123,
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth edition, p.919

NATURAL RIGHTS - ... are the rights of life, liberty, privacy, and good
reputation.
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p. 1324

ABSOLUTE RIGHTS - ... which are such as appertain and belong to particular men, merely as individuals or single persons...

PRIVATE PROPERTY - As protected from being taken for public uses, is such property as belongs absolutely to an individual, and of which he has the exclusive right of disposition. Property of a specific, fixed and tangible nature, capable of being in possession and transmitted to another, such as houses, lands, and chattels." - - - Black's Law dictionary, sixth ed., p.1217

OWNERSHIP - ... Ownership of property is either absolute or qualified. The ownership of property is absolute when a single person has the absolute dominion over it... The ownership is qualified when it is shared with one or more persons, when the time of enjoyment is deferred or limited, or when the use is restricted. " - - -Black's Law dictionary, sixth ed., p. 1106
If the socialist collective determines how you use the collective's property, and you cannot absolutely own your self, your labor and the fruits of your labor, you are nothing more than a socialist slave.

Is that what all your "other books" attempt to hide?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top