Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-14-2009, 06:29 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,914,172 times
Reputation: 4459

Advertisements

Internal Memo Confirms Big Giveaways In White House Deal With Big Pharma (huffington post)


A memo obtained by the Huffington Post confirms that the White House and the pharmaceutical lobby secretly agreed to precisely the sort of wide-ranging deal that both parties have been denying over the past week.

how is that going to bring down health care costs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-14-2009, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Thumb of Michigan
4,494 posts, read 7,481,893 times
Reputation: 2541
Time to use NAFTA in all its glory and shop for pharma meds wholesale in Nogales, Sonora, Mexico.

Nogales, Sonora - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Because of its proximity to Tucson, AZ, Nogales has become one of the largest providers of health care in Mexico for US patients. The medical and dental community has succeeded in providing care that is comparable to the USA in professionalism, equipment, and competency at a price that is 40% to 60% cheaper than in the USA.

Maybe some entrepenuer will set up something for online shopping.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2009, 06:59 AM
 
4,604 posts, read 8,231,864 times
Reputation: 1266
The deal, as outlined in the memo:

Quote:
Commitment of up to $80 billion, but not more than $80 billion. 1. Agree to increase of Medicaid rebate from 15.1 - 23.1% ($34 billion)
2. Agree to get FOBs done (but no agreement on details -- express disagreement on data exclusivity which both sides say does not affect the score of the legislation.) ($9 billion)
3. Sell drugs to patients in the donut hole at 50% discount ($25 billion)
This totals $68 billion
4. Companies will be assessed a tax or fee that will score at $12 billion. There was no agreement as to how or on what this tax/fee will be based.
Total: $80 billion

In exchange for these items, the White House agreed to:
1. Oppose importation
2. Oppose rebates in Medicare Part D
3. Oppose repeal of non-interference
4. Oppose opening Medicare Part B
OBAMA ! ! !

The legend continues...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2009, 07:02 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,914,172 times
Reputation: 4459
i think we have given enough money to foreign countries, don't you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2009, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,346,581 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
Internal Memo Confirms Big Giveaways In White House Deal With Big Pharma (huffington post)


A memo obtained by the Huffington Post confirms that the White House and the pharmaceutical lobby secretly agreed to precisely the sort of wide-ranging deal that both parties have been denying over the past week.

how is that going to bring down health care costs?

From the article:

"Representatives from both the White House and PhRMA, shown the outline, adamantly denied that it reflected reality. PhRMA senior vice president Ken Johnson said that the outline "is simply not accurate."


"Johnson added that "no outside lobbyists -- not a single one -- were ever involved in our discussions with the Senate Finance Committee or the White House so someone is blowing smoke."

"But the lobbyist who was given the outline defended its authenticity. And although the White House now says that drug price negotiations and reimportation were not actually discussed in the talks with PhRMA, the lobbyist said: "Well, that's bull -- that's baloney. That was part of the deal, for them not to push that."




Glad you all will believe the word of a un-named health care lobbyist (for the insurance companies) who wasn't there, with a typed meno, no letter head, no signatures. Of course, if it was 'real' the parties involved would need to title the memo pharma deal, just so it wouldn't be confused other similar deals and add the date just for reference.

Last edited by plannine; 08-14-2009 at 07:21 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2009, 07:17 AM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,948,683 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by plannine View Post
From the article:

"Representatives from both the White House and PhRMA, shown the outline, adamantly denied that it reflected reality. PhRMA senior vice president Ken Johnson said that the outline "is simply not accurate."
"Johnson added that "no outside lobbyists -- not a single one -- were ever involved in our discussions with the Senate Finance Committee or the White House so someone is blowing smoke."
But the lobbyist who was given the outline defended its authenticity. And although the White House now says that drug price negotiations and reimportation were not actually discussed in the talks with PhRMA, the lobbyist said: "Well, that's bull -- that's baloney. That was part of the deal, for them not to push that."




Glad you all will believe the word of a un-named health care lobbyist (for the insurance companies) with a typed meno, no letter head, no signatures who wasn't there.
While I agree the information is suspect. The fact is that I have not seen any legislation that would allow americans to purchase drugs from Canada. This is what we need. You have to ask why is that? Obama and congress should be called on the carpet for that. We need competition in the drug industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2009, 07:17 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,695,729 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by plannine View Post
From the article:

"Representatives from both the White House and PhRMA, shown the outline, adamantly denied that it reflected reality. PhRMA senior vice president Ken Johnson said that the outline "is simply not accurate."

"Johnson added that "no outside lobbyists -- not a single one -- were ever involved in our discussions with the Senate Finance Committee or the White House so someone is blowing smoke."
But the lobbyist who was given the outline defended its authenticity. And although the White House now says that drug price negotiations and reimportation were not actually discussed in the talks with PhRMA, the lobbyist said: "Well, that's bull -- that's baloney. That was part of the deal, for them not to push that."

Glad you all will believe the word of a un-named health care lobbyist (for the insurance companies) with a typed meno, no letter head, no signatures who wasn't there.
Yes, I'd sooner believe a lobbyist than the White House on this. The lobbyist has nothing to lose, the White House has everything to lose (Obama's health care bill). They don't want us to know what they are agreeing to behind closed doors. I was hoping that at the very least Obama would press for allowing us to get drugs from Canada at discounted prices, but no. We're getting shafted on that also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2009, 07:19 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,698 posts, read 34,555,075 times
Reputation: 29287
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillysB View Post
OBAMA ! ! !

The legend continues...
you no like hopey-changey?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2009, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Thumb of Michigan
4,494 posts, read 7,481,893 times
Reputation: 2541
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
i think we have given enough money to foreign countries, don't you?
Being sarcastic....

The irony is thick in this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2009, 07:26 AM
 
14,993 posts, read 23,892,069 times
Reputation: 26523
The question is - why are the pharaucetical companies endorsing the Health Care Plan? What's in it for them?

There was a deal made - Obama sold out the American people. In exchange for an ill-defined promise of savings, and more importantly an endorsement of the plan, Obama agreed to not include drug import or drug cost negotiations into the plan or into legislation. These two items would have saved the American people much much more than any agreement he struck.

This internal memo may very well be suspect (as is Huffington press itself), but this is not the only report of this making the rounds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top