Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which of the following groups would you like to ban from voting?
High-school dropouts 6 8.00%
People convicted of misdemeanor crimes 2 2.67%
People convicted of felony crimes 20 26.67%
Welfare recipients 10 13.33%
People who don't speak English 22 29.33%
The unemployed 1 1.33%
People who don't own property (renters) 2 2.67%
Homosexuals 3 4.00%
Blacks 4 5.33%
Other (please post) 11 14.67%
I would not ban any of the groups listed above from voting 28 37.33%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-18-2009, 04:30 PM
 
1,501 posts, read 5,680,876 times
Reputation: 1164

Advertisements

Bud Selig and his band of merry morons. Lets deport him somewhere while we're at it.

(This makes more sense than listing black people, renters ... and homo'als on this poll!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-18-2009, 06:45 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,667,610 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElizNJ View Post
I would take away voter privilege from the 18-20 age group, with the exception of those in the military. I don't feel as though those in this age group have the life experience necessary to make an informed choice.
Hmm. Then maybe we should ban people with Alzheimer's Disease or those who are senile. How can they make an informed choice if they can't even remember their own names?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,695,782 times
Reputation: 9980
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Hmm. Then maybe we should ban people with Alzheimer's Disease or those who are senile. How can they make an informed choice if they can't even remember their own names?
That would silence the Senate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 07:02 PM
 
Location: No Mask For Me This Time, Either
5,660 posts, read 5,087,879 times
Reputation: 6086
Quote:
Originally Posted by idahogie View Post
Bull. You make an arbitrary standard - language - as your measure of commitment to this country. That's been tried before using other idiotic measures - money, land ownership, ancestry. It was stupid and wrong back then, and you're doing the same thing now. Judging a whole class of people based on your stereotype. It's disgusting.

I'm glad there is no bird emoticon - it would reduce your comment to a pile of stupidity with an obscene gesture at the end.
While you seem to choose to "celebrate" diversity, focusing on what makes each "unique" and "special" while ignoring common factors which should be used to draw us together as citizens of a unified nation? This silly idea of "multiculturalism" is what has the US population at such odds with itself. If we can't have a language in common, then what else could bind us? I stand by my vote - if you can't speak the lingua franca (the vehicular language) of our nation, then no vote. Speaking English in and of itself is not a measure of commitment, but it is a sign of wanting to be a communicating, informed member of our society able to interact with others in a meaningful way.

Case in point. I was at DMV awhile back. Two Asian women in front of me at the counter. One was arguing heatedly that the second needed her written driving test to be provided in Chinese. The clerk repeatedly told her it was not available. The woman got more and more upset. Finally the clerk said "Listen, when she's driving, the road signs aren't in Chinese! If she can't read English well enough to pass the test, she shouldn't be driving on our roads! Next!" Doesn't this same principal apply to voting?

And if you're seeking to amuse yourself by finding stupidity, you really don't need to look past your own keyboard. <Tweet-tweet>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,477,762 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by mackinac81 View Post
If there was a way to do it, I'd revoke people who couldn't pass a basic civics test, but (sigh) there'd be no way to really do it fairly. Oh well.
Sure there is. Have a mandatory civics course in the senior year of high school, followed by a standardized test.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top