Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"All I can tell you is that Sunday must have been a very slow news day, because here's the bottom line: absolutely nothing has changed,"
she said. "We continue to support the public option that will help lower costs, give American consumers more choice and keep private insurers honest."
"All I can tell you is that Sunday must have been a very slow news day, because here's the bottom line: absolutely nothing has changed,"
she said. "We continue to support the public option that will help lower costs, give American consumers more choice and keep private insurers honest."
yet another miscue....I thought she had just got done saying that there doesn't have to be a public option?
Actually what I have been hearing is that the Administration intentionally put the word out to see what kind of blow back they would get and appearently they received a lot so...
Actually what I have been hearing is that the Administration intentionally put the word out to see what kind of blow back they would get and appearently they received a lot so...
oh ok, it was deception. A fine liberal tactic. I got it now.
"All I can tell you is that Sunday must have been a very slow news day, because here's the bottom line: absolutely nothing has changed,"
she said. "We continue to support the public option that will help lower costs, give American consumers more choice and keep private insurers honest."
Actually what I have been hearing is that the Administration intentionally put the word out to see what kind of blow back they would get and appearently they received a lot so...
I don't give the Administration that much credit. I think it's more of a case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing. However, if it was an intentional miscue to gauge blowback, they certainly got their answer.
"All I can tell you is that Sunday must have been a very slow news day, because here's the bottom line: absolutely nothing has changed,"
she said. "We continue to support the public option that will help lower costs, give American consumers more choice and keep private insurers honest."
Against whom is she pushing back? Conservatives applauded the administration's retreat on the public option. The flack they got was from the left wing of their own party. So this is not a "push back". It's a surrender to the loons on their left flank. And the loons will take the whole thing down with them.
I don't give the Administration that much credit. I think it's more of a case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing. However, if it was an intentional miscue to gauge blowback, they certainly got their answer.
Yes they did. For those of us who want National healthcare there can be no compromise on the public option. Any democrat voting against it, see ya!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
