More Czars than Cabinet heads; How can this be constitutional? (Congress, polls)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
IBDeditorials.com: Editorials, Political Cartoons, and Polls from Investor's Business Daily -- More Bloomin' Czars (http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=335660093354583 - broken link)
Quote:
Big Government: Ron Bloom, who heads the government's auto task force, may soon have a new job. As Bloomberg reports, the White House wants him to become a new de facto manufacturing czar. What next?
The question naturally arises: Do we really need a factory guru, especially one whose expertise is in advising labor unions — the cause of much of the U.S. steel and car industries’ woes?
Excellent question. Another is - can you imagine what the press would have done to a republican president?
It’s a good question, but a better one is this: what authority does the federal government have to set up commissars for private industry at all? This question becomes even more urgent when these “czars” have no accountability to or oversight from Congress, whether they choose to exercise it or not.
Its not....it circumvents all of the checks and balances..and it is no accident...wake up America...how about the "green jobs czar being an admitted Communist...how can that be right??
I am not troubled that he has advisors. All presidents do, they just call them different things.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.