A Liberal Mother's Logic (Hispanics, party, money, status)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are right. I didn't grow up priviledged, nor did I attend an outstanding school system. But I thank God that someone at UCLA took notice and saw that I was motivated to tackle on the challenge of university work, even though I did need a lot of tutoring along the way. That investment in me paid off big time because now I am giving something back to the same community of kids who were just like me--black, brown, and poor by teaching them in the classroom. ABOUT 40% OF MY STUDENTS COME TO ME BELOW GRADE LEVEL BUT WHEN THEY LEAVE MY CLASSROOM THEY ARE AT OR VERY NEAR GRADE LEVEL. I HAVE THE TEST DATA TO PROVE IT.
Congratulations!
I wonder, though, if you're so smart, why you gave any credence to a second (third? fourth?)-hand story Michael Savage told about what some "Liberal mother" allegedly said?
You are right. I didn't grow up priviledged, nor did I attend an outstanding school system. But I thank God that someone at UCLA took notice and saw that I was motivated to tackle on the challenge of university work, even though I did need a lot of tutoring along the way. That investment in me paid off big time because now I am giving something back to the same community of kids who were just like me--black, brown, and poor by teaching them in the classroom. ABOUT 40% OF MY STUDENTS COME TO ME BELOW GRADE LEVEL BUT WHEN THEY LEAVE MY CLASSROOM THEY ARE AT OR VERY NEAR GRADE LEVEL. I HAVE THE TEST DATA TO PROVE IT.
See, that's the point of why the UC system does that. In hopes of those to continue to foster knowledge in their communities. UCSB is still VERY homogenous economically. It has the lowest percentage of students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Everybody is suburban upper middle class. They want to include more diverse communities to take advantage of its programs so people can contribute back. To be strictly racial is one thing, but to acknowledge a hard background (regardless of race) is another.
I wonder, though, if you're so smart, why you gave any credence to a second (third? fourth?)-hand story Michael Savage told about what some "Liberal mother" allegedly said?
Dude, back away from the radio. . .
Or why they created a thread about a topic they heard a year or two ago.
I wonder, though, if you're so smart, why you gave any credence to a second (third? fourth?)-hand story Michael Savage told about what some "Liberal mother" allegedly said?
Dude, back away from the radio. . .
I wonder why you wonder if I am smart or not? I have plenty of posts on many topics in various forums, that you are more than welcome to read, and then you can be the judge for your self.
I started this thread just to dialogue about something that was said by a conservative radio talk show host who basically was ranting about a liberal mother who, in his opinion, suffers from a mental illness because she didn't have a problem with a less qualified minority child getting admitting into a university over her more qualified child. I don't think the issue for him was what type of university the mother's child wanted to attend, but it was the mother's willingness to be PC and not have a problem with her child being denied admission. That segment was dealing with liberalism and many liberals logic--whether you agree with them or not.
By the way, this topic must be interesting due to the number of replies. Give me some credit for at least making people dialogue about it.
I wonder why you wonder why I wondered whether you were smart or not, since that's not what I said. I wondered why you gave any credence to that nutjob, given that you're so smart.
But now I'm wondering whether you're smart or not.
I wonder why you wonder why I wondered whether you were smart or not, since that's not what I said. I wondered why you gave any credence to that nutjob, given that you're so smart.
But now I'm wondering whether you're smart or not.
Good job on creating a dialogue, though.
Funny, and I am really ha ha ha h a haing at you. But, you replied to my op with a question regarding whether or not I am smart. So are you saying, if I am reading between the lines--inferencing, that dumb people listen to conservative talk show hosts? Now that's not fair or open minded at all, even if you don't agree with any conservative talk show hosts.
So because ONE liberal mother thinks this ALL of them think this?
So if your black mom and my black mom agree on a political topic, ALL black mothers think the same?
Why must we turn this topic into a big generalization? All I was trying to do get people to dialogue about a mother's thinking in regard to her child, and it wasn't me attacking any liberal person for thinking like this mother. All I am trying to do is to try and understand her logic because if someone asked me the same question about my highly qualified black child getting denied over a less qualified white, asian, or mexican child, I would unequivocably say, "Yes, I have a problem with that," and I wouldn't be PC about it at all. Right is right, and fair is fair, and, like Michael Savage, where's the logic in not fighting for your child's potential future.
It does not exemplify "Liberal" thinking, unless you believe that a sample size of 1 is really accurate portrayal of 150 million people.
The title of this thread is "A Liberal Mother's Logic," and I deliberately titled it that way so that no one was thinking that I was attacking LIBERALS as a whole.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.