Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He denies being a truther, but he offers no explanation how his name got on the list.
Sanrene, the left here and around the country are having a hard time defending all the Obama mistakes. They have now resorted to making excuses for all this instead of trying to defend it.
Before long they will run out of dribble and give up.
They know they are in trouble and it is killing them that they picked a total failure.
Watch them closely, the left wing mobsters are scrambling to keep up as something new comes out every single day.
I just did a search about this clown, on c-d, couldn't find anything of prominence, but a lot buried in the superfluous bs. Here's something for you to chew on.
If Obama plays his cards right, the American public isn't going to know what has hit them until the bullet comes out the back of the head.
Go ahead, accuse me of mongering, accuse me of provocation of some sort. I don't really care what you ID-10-Ts on the left think. It's my country, too, and this pisses me off, royally. Bite me, already.
I can think of a much better descriptive word to use other than A** Hole but than I would be more than likely banned... Ok, I won't accuse you of fear mongering because you self proclaim the fact...
By "Truther" do you mean "someone with questions they want answered"?
Because that's what this statement is -- a string of questions and a request that they be officially answered.
It's not an announcement that something DID or DID NOT happen - it's not a Truther document at all.
By this definition, Beck is a Truther. He has spent a great deal of time and effort to show the relationships and histories, and has a string of questions that he asks the citizenry to request that they be officially answered.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
I have offered to pay the fee to get it but he has to unseal it because of that stupid law he used to seal it up
And why do you suppose he felt the need to seal it up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
Beck has opened doors about Van Jones that Obama never wanted opened and it gets riper all the time. Jones wants only to cause as much dissent among us as he can and nothing else.
I heard it said by a liberal that Beck is only going after Jones because Jones started the petition for advertisers to boycott the show. If that's true, I haven't heard it. I suspect the reverse is more likely true. Jones is going AFTER Beck because Beck exposed him for who he is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead
Admittedly it's been a while. He sickened me the times I did watch when I realized that people took him seriously.
I would rather you tell me what he's saying - he is just too hideous for me to watch.
With things that are this important, it's best to hear it first hand yourself, not second hand or third hand, don't you think?
That's why we'd love for the White House to set these concerns about the radicals (Obama's trusted advisors) to rest. You see, these people would not pass an FBI security check to get anything resembling clearance. On a normal day they might not even be allowed into the White House for a visitor tour. Obama appointed Jones and the rest of that bunch because he likes the way they think, and wanted to surround himself with people like that.
That is the only conclusion - the other would be that he didn't know, which is plain silly.
Last edited by swbtoo; 09-03-2009 at 09:07 PM..
Reason: sp
Why do you presume he hasnt outgrown his "ultra-radical thoughts"? He's been busy since 1991. You can follow his progression quickly at wikipedia: look, here it is: Van Jones - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
other places too but this sums it up quick and you can check the cites. (For interesting dimensions that will remind you of C-D click the Talk tab and the History tab.)
I presume because I have seen tape of him saying stupid things in the last couple of years.
In a statement issued Thursday evening Jones said of “the petition that was circulated today, I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever.”
So, let's see. He doesn't deny signing it, just that he doesn't agree with the statement - do I have that right?
Usually, when we put our name on a petition, one might assume that you would agree with the statement you're putting your name to.
What a friggin liar. Do they really expect people to believe this?
I wonder what genius in the WH came up with this strategic defense of the communist, black radical, racist Van Jones.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ok, I won't accuse you of fear mongering because you self proclaim the fact...
classic right wing conversation....
